Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from rice production systems in Brazil: A comparison between minimal tillage and organic farming

被引:56
|
作者
Nunes, Flavia Aparecida [1 ]
Seferin, Marcus [2 ]
Maciel, Vinicius Goncalves [2 ]
Flores, Simone Hickmann [1 ]
Zachia Ayub, Marco Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Inst Food Sci & Technol, Biotechnol & Biochem Engn Lab BiotecLab, Av Bento Goncalves,9500,POB 15090, BR-91501970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Chem, Postgrad Program Mat Engn & Technol, Av Ipiranga 6681, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Life cycle assessment; GHG emissions; Rice cultivation; Minimal tillage system; Organic farming; NITROGEN-FERTILIZATION; FOOD-PRODUCTS; CH4; EMISSIONS; PADDY FIELDS; SOIL; LCA; MANAGEMENT; METHANE; MANURE; STRAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.106
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Knowledge on the environmental impact caused by rice cultivation, the most consumed cereal in the world, is essential to assess agricultural impact on total global anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases. Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), we compared the Global Warming Potential (GWP) of white and brown rice from two different cultivation systems, minimal tillage and organic, under the practices and climate conditions prevailing in the south of Brazil, the most important rice-producer region in Latin America. The "Cradle to Gate" approach was used, including the stages of cultivation, grain drying, and processing, considering the functional unit of 1 kg of protein produced. The results were characterized using the IPCC 2013 method. The highest value of GWP 100 was observed for the organic white rice, equivalent to 35.53 kg CO2-eq/kg of protein, followed by the organic brown rice, equivalent to 26.50 kg CO2-eq/kg of protein, whereas the lowest GWP 100, equivalent to 15.80 kg CO2-eq/kg of protein, was observed for the minimal white rice. The minimal tillage brown rice, released 20.91 kg CO2-eq/kg of protein. Results clearly show that the cultivation stage is the hotspot for environmental impacts, caused by field emissions, which represented 91% in the organic farming and 61% in the minimal tillage system. The use of mineral fertilizers, in the case of the minimal tillage system, represented 34% of the emissions. This research might help in the elaboration of rice production inventories, as well as in trying to provide reliable information to stakeholders in order to choose sustainable products and processes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 809
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Twelve Organic and Conventional Farming Systems: A Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Perspective
    Venkat, Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2012, 36 (06): : 620 - 649
  • [2] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from five contrasting rice production systems in the tropics
    Dash, Pradeep K.
    Bhattacharyya, Pratap
    Padhy, Soumya R.
    Nayak, Amaresh K.
    Poonam, Annie
    Mohanty, Sangita
    [J]. PEDOSPHERE, 2023, 33 (06) : 960 - 971
  • [3] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from five contrasting rice production systems in the tropics
    Pradeep K.DASH
    Pratap BHATTACHARYYA
    Soumya R.PADHY
    Amaresh K.NAYAK
    Annie POONAM
    Sangita MOHANTY
    [J]. Pedosphere, 2023, (06) : 960 - 971
  • [4] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from five contrasting rice production systems in the tropics
    Pradeep K.DASH
    Pratap BHATTACHARYYA
    Soumya R.PADHY
    Amaresh K.NAYAK
    Annie POONAM
    Sangita MOHANTY
    [J]. Pedosphere, 2023, 33 (06) : 960 - 971
  • [5] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in California rice production
    Brodt, Sonja
    Kendall, Alissa
    Moharnmadi, Yaser
    Arslan, Aslihan
    Yuan, Juhong
    Lee, In-Sung
    Linquist, Bruce
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2014, 169 : 89 - 98
  • [6] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from integrated organic farming: A systems approach considering rotation cycles
    Jeswani, Harish K.
    Espinoza-Orias, Namy
    Croker, Tim
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2018, 13 : 60 - 79
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment comparison between brow parboiled rice produced under organic and minimal tillage cultivation systems
    Nunes, Flavia Aparecida
    Seferin, Marcus
    Maciel, Vinicius Goncalves
    Zachia Ayub, Marco Antonio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 161 : 95 - 104
  • [8] Greenhouse gas emissions from life cycle assessment of Norwegian food production systems
    Refsgaard, K.
    Bergsdal, H.
    Berglann, H.
    Pettersen, J.
    [J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 62 (04): : 336 - 346
  • [9] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from geothermal electricity production
    Sullivan, J. L.
    Wang, M. Q.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2013, 5 (06)
  • [10] An international comparison of rice consumption behaviours and greenhouse gas emissions from rice production
    Maraseni, Tek Narayan
    Deo, Ravinesh C.
    Qu, Jiansheng
    Gentle, Popular
    Neupane, Prem Raj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 2288 - 2300