Bank ownership, privatization, and performance: Evidence from a transition country

被引:132
|
作者
Jiang, Chunxia [1 ]
Yao, Shujie [2 ,3 ]
Feng, Genfu [3 ]
机构
[1] Middlesex Univ, Sch Business, London NW4 4BT, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Contemporary Chinese Studies, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
关键词
Bank performance; Privatization; Minority foreign ownership; Efficiency; EFFICIENCY; CHINA; COST; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.05.009
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper combines the static effect of ownership and the dynamic effect of privatization on bank performance in China over 1995-2010, reporting a significantly higher performance by private intermediaries - joint stock commercial banks and city commercial banks - relative to state-owned commercial banks. However, publicly traded banks, subject to multiple monitoring and vetting in capital markets, perform better regardless of ownership status. The privatization of banks has improved performance with respect to revenue inflow and efficiency gains in the short- or long-run (initial public offerings). The positive long-run effect is more relevant and. significant for banking institutions with minority foreign ownership. Moreover, this paper innovatively estimates interest income efficiency and non-interest income efficiency at the same time. The results suggest that Chinese banks are much more efficient in generating interest income than raising non-interest revenue, although the latter aspect has improved significantly during the sample period. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3364 / 3372
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Privatization, state ownership, and bank performance in Egypt
    Omran, Mohammed
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 35 (04) : 714 - 733
  • [2] Effect of country governance on bank privatization performance
    Ho, Po-Hsin
    Lin, Chih-Yung
    Tsai, Wei-Che
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2016, 43 : 3 - 18
  • [3] Bank privatization and performance: Empirical evidence from Nigeria
    Beck, T
    Cull, R
    Jerome, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2005, 29 (8-9) : 2355 - 2379
  • [4] Partial privatization and bank performance: evidence from India
    Sarkar, Subrata
    Sensarma, Rudra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMIC POLICY, 2010, 2 (04) : 276 - 306
  • [5] Post-privatization state ownership and bank risk-taking: Cross-country evidence
    Boubakri, Narjess
    El Ghoul, Sadok
    Guedhami, Omrane
    Hossain, Mahmud
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 64
  • [6] Bank ownership, performance, and the politics: Evidence from Taiwan
    Chen, Pei-Fen
    Liu, Ping-Chin
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2013, 31 : 578 - 585
  • [7] Ownership concentration and bank performance: Evidence from India
    Gupta, Neeraj
    Mittal, Sachin
    Agarwal, Tarun
    Bakhshi, Priti
    Sahoo, Minati
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [8] Ownership dispersion and bank performance: Evidence from China
    Bian, Wenlong
    Deng, Chao
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 22 : 49 - 52
  • [9] Ownership, bank size, capitalization and bank performance: Evidence from India
    Gupta, Neeraj
    Mahakud, Jitendra
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 8 (01):
  • [10] Market entry, privatization and bank performance in transition
    Fries, Steven
    Neven, Damien
    Seabright, Paul
    Taci, Anita
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION, 2006, 14 (04) : 579 - 610