New Perspectives on Statistical Decisions Under Ambiguity

被引:10
|
作者
Stoye, Joerg [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Econ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
来源
关键词
statistical decision theory; minimax; minimax regret; treatment choice; partial identification; REGRET TREATMENT CHOICE; EXPECTED UTILITY; TREATMENT RULES; IDENTIFICATION; DISTRIBUTIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110959
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This review summarizes and connects recent work on the foundations and applications of statistical decision theory. Minimax models of decisions making under ambiguity are identified as a thread running through several literatures. In axiomatic decision theory, these models motivated a large literature on modeling ambiguity aversion. Some findings of this literature are reported in a way that should be directly accessible to statisticians and econometricians. In statistical decision theory, the models inform a rich theory of estimation and treatment choice, which was recently extended to account for partial identification and thereby ambiguity that does not vanish with sample size. This literature is illustrated by discussing global, finite-sample admissible, and minimax decision rules for a number of stylized decision problems with point and partial identification.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 282
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Statistical decisions under ambiguity
    Jörg Stoye
    [J]. Theory and Decision, 2011, 70 : 129 - 148
  • [2] Statistical decisions under ambiguity
    Stoye, Joerg
    [J]. THEORY AND DECISION, 2011, 70 (02) : 129 - 148
  • [3] FRAMING OF DECISIONS UNDER AMBIGUITY
    KASHIMA, Y
    MAHER, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 1995, 8 (01) : 33 - 49
  • [4] Treatment decisions under ambiguity
    Berger, Loic
    Bleichrodt, Han
    Eeckhoudt, Louis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2013, 32 (03) : 559 - 569
  • [5] Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk in multiple sclerosis
    Farez, M. F.
    Crivelli, L.
    Leiguarda, R.
    Correale, J.
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2012, 18 : 410 - 411
  • [6] Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk
    Zamarian, Laura
    Sinz, Hermann
    Bonatti, Elisabeth
    Gamboz, Nadia
    Delazer, Margarete
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 22 (05) : 645 - 657
  • [7] MODELING AMBIGUITY IN DECISIONS UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    KAHN, BE
    SARIN, RK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1988, 15 (02) : 265 - 272
  • [8] Insurance decisions under nonperformance risk and ambiguity
    Lambregts, Timo R.
    van Bruggen, Paul
    Bleichrodt, Han
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2021, 63 (03) : 229 - 253
  • [9] An experimental investigation of newsvendor decisions under ambiguity
    Shinde, Abhishek
    Mehta, Peeyush
    Amit, R. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2021, 59 (19) : 5960 - 5971
  • [10] Decisions under ambiguity: Effects of sign and magnitude
    Inukai, Keigo
    Takahashi, Taiki
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 496 - 496