Mass mailing campaigns to promote screening for cervical cancer: Do they work, and do they continue to work?

被引:16
|
作者
Byles, JE [1 ]
SansonFisher, RW [1 ]
机构
[1] HUNTER CTR HLTH ADV,NEWCASTLE,NSW,AUSTRALIA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-842X.1996.tb01025.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Campaigns involving sending personally addressed fetters to encourage women to have Pap smears increase Pap smear rates. The aim of this study was to assess whether this effect is maintained when campaigns are repeated regularly. In October 1992, a letter reminding women of the importance of screening was mailed to all women in three New South Wales postcode regions where a similar letter had been sent three years previously. The response was compared to the response in three regions receiving no earlier letter. The number of women attending for cervical screening during the three months after distribution of the letters was assessed from Health Insurance Commission claims for cervical cytology. These attendances were compared with expected attendances based on the attendance patterns over 28 pre-intervention quarters. Significant postintervention increases in attendance were observed in all three regions receiving an initial letter. However, in one region, the increase in attendances, around 1 per cent of eligible women, was not significantly greater than the increase in the control region (z = 0.15, P = 0.88). The second letter campaign had no measurable effect on attendances. No significant increase in screenings was observed in two of the towns. A significant increase was observed in one region, but this was not significantly greater than the increase in the control region (z = -0.05, P = 0.96). These results suggest that repeated direct-mail campaigns to promote screening for cervical cancer may be of no benefit. A one-off campaign may result in an increase in screenings in the short term.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 260
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public campaigns do not always work
    Beecham, L
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7164): : 970 - 970
  • [2] Scald prevention campaigns: Do they work?
    Spallek, Melanie
    Nixon, Jim
    Bain, Chris
    Purdie, David M.
    Spinks, Anneliese
    Scott, Debbie
    McClure, Rod J.
    JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2007, 28 (02): : 328 - 333
  • [3] Road safety campaigns: do they work?
    Chinnock, P
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2005, 11 (03) : 151 - 151
  • [4] DROWNING PREVENTION CAMPAIGNS, DO THEY REALLY WORK?
    Dominguez, Ana M.
    Pino, Jessica
    Garcia, Alberto
    Garcia, Isabel
    Gonzalez, Ines
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2018, 24 : A153 - A153
  • [5] Do we go back to work or do we continue our life ?
    Pelicier, N.
    Bergerot, P.
    Bacque, M. -F.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGIE, 2014, 8 (03) : 133 - 134
  • [6] Shift Work and Cancer Screening: Do Females Who Work Alternative Shifts Undergo Recommended Cancer Screening?
    Tsai, Rebecca J.
    Luckhaupt, Sara E.
    Sweeney, Marie Haring
    Calvert, Geoffrey M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2014, 57 (03) : 265 - 275
  • [7] COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING: WE STILL HAVE WORK TO DO
    Baker, Kathy
    GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2023, 46 (02) : 92 - 94
  • [8] Do cancer predictions work?
    Dyba, Tadeusz
    Hakulinen, Timo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (03) : 448 - 453
  • [9] HOW TO DO A MASS MAILING ON DIALMAIL
    STASKIEWICZ, M
    ONLINE, 1989, 13 (02): : 43 - 43
  • [10] Who Will Do the Work? What Work Will They Do?
    Blayney, Douglas W.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2007, 3 (02) : 53 - 53