Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial, of labour

被引:19
|
作者
Spaans, WA
Sluijs, MB
van Roosmalen, J
Bleker, OP
机构
[1] Juliana Childrens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, NL-7300 DS Apeldoorn, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
previous caesarean section; trial of labor; labour pattern; partograph;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00464-X
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify risk factors at caesarean section (CS), related to failure of a trial of labour (TOL) in subsequent pregnancy. Study design: Hospital records (1988-1999) of the index pregnancy were reviewed at caesarean delivery for oxytocine use, indication for caesarean, dilatation of cervix, speed of dilatation, duration of contractions and birth weight. The records of the subsequent pregnancy were reviewed for successful vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC), maternal and neonatal outcome. Data were tested for statistical significance with a Mantel-Haenszel equation for odds ratios (OR, with 95% confidence interval (CI)), a Fisher exact test or a Student's T-test. Results: From 214 women with a previous caesarean section, 68.7% underwent a TOL, which was successful in 71.4%. A labour pattern during the index pregnancy characterised by oxytocine use (OR = 3.1; 95% Cl = 1.4-7.1), contractions for more than 12 h (OR = 3.0; 95% Cl = 1.3-7.0) and cervical dilatation less than 1 cm/h (OR = 5.6; 95% Cl = 1.1-39.4) increased the risk of a failed TOL at subsequent labour significantly. Conclusion: Women who attempt VBAC may be informed that a labour pattern of their index pregnancy characterised by oxytocine use, contractions for more than 12 h and slow dilatation is associated with a reduced chance of success. A partograph obtained during first labour can be a managerial tool for subsequent labour. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 166
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rupture of caesarean section scar in subsequent pregnancy or labour
    Mackenzie, WR
    [J]. LANCET, 1922, 1 : 786 - 788
  • [2] RUPTURE OF THE CAESAREAN SECTION SCAR IN SUBSEQUENT PREGNANCY AND LABOUR
    STERN, DM
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1954, 47 (02): : 123 - 126
  • [3] Trial of labour after previous caesarean section: The predictive factors affecting outcome
    Madaan, M.
    Agrawal, S.
    Nigam, A.
    Aggarwal, R.
    Trivedi, S. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 31 (03) : 224 - 228
  • [4] Maternal height as a risk factor for caesarean section due to failure to progress in labour
    McGuinness, BJ
    Trivedi, AN
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 39 (02): : 152 - 154
  • [5] Stage of Labour at Caesarean Section Delivery and Risk of Subsequent Preterm Birth: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Liu, C. Z.
    Ho, N.
    Lehner, C.
    Sekar, R.
    Amoako, A. A.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 : 44 - 44
  • [6] Trial of labour after caesarean section (TOLAC): An audit
    Don, J. R.
    Pathiraja, R.
    Silva, D.
    Jayawardane, M.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 82 - 82
  • [7] Indications for First Caesarean and Delivery Mode in Subsequent Trial of Labour
    Fagerberg, Marie C.
    Marsal, Karel
    Ekstrom, Per
    Kallen, Karin
    [J]. PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 27 (01) : 72 - 80
  • [8] Prevalence of spontaneous, induced labour or planned caesarean section and factors associated with caesarean section in low-risk women in southern Brazil
    Velho, Manuela Beatriz
    Bruggemann, Odalea Maria
    McCourt, Christine
    Freitas, Paulo Fontoura
    Nogueira da Gama, Silvana Granado
    Costa, Roberta
    d'Orsi, Eleonora
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2019, 79
  • [9] Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy
    Smith, GCS
    Pell, JP
    Dobbie, R
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 362 (9398): : 1779 - 1784
  • [10] Trial of labour after caesarean section: is it worth it with fetal macrosomia?
    Lopian, M.
    Ligumski, L. K.
    Lessing, J. B.
    Perlman, S.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 : 171 - 172