Mercury vapour exposure during dental student training in amalgam removal

被引:11
|
作者
Warwick, Robin [1 ]
O'Connor, Andrea [2 ]
Lamey, Brianne [3 ]
机构
[1] Hanna Dent Clin, Hanna, AB, Canada
[2] House Dent Ctr, Red Deer, AB, Canada
[3] Innisfail Family Dent, Innisfail, AB, Canada
关键词
Mercury; Mercury vapor; Dental amalgam; Occupational exposure to mercury; Amalgam removal; OCCUPATIONAL-EXPOSURE; DENTISTS; INHALATION;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6673-8-27
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Amalgam that is used for dental fillings contains approximately 50% elemental mercury. During dental student training, amalgam is often removed by drilling without the use of water spray and suction, which are protective measures in preventing mercury aerosol. In this study we measured mercury vapor levels in ambient air during amalgam removal as is typically performed in dental training. Methods: Mercury vapor levels in ambient air were measured in a dental school laboratory during removal of amalgam fillings from artificial teeth set into a dental jaw simulator. Mercury vapor was measured under three conditions (25 measurements each): with the simultaneous use of water spray and suction, with the use of suction only, and with the use of neither suction nor water spray. These three conditions are all used during dental student training. Results were compared to Alberta occupational exposure limits for mercury vapor in order to assess potential occupational risk to students. Analysis of variance testing was used to compare data obtained under the three conditions. Results: When water spray and suction were used, mercury vapor levels ranged from 4.0 to 19.0 mu g/m(3) (arithmetic mean = 8.0 mu g/m(3)); when suction only was used, mercury vapor levels ranged from 14.0 to 999.0 (999.0 mu g/m(3) represents the high limit detection of the Jerome analyzer) (arithmetic mean = 141.0 mu g/m(3)); when neither suction nor water was used, the vapor levels ranged from 34.0 to 796.0 mu g/m(3) (arithmetic mean = 214.0 mu g/m(3)). Conclusions: The Alberta Occupational Health and Safety threshold limit value for mercury vapor over an eight-hour time-weighted period is 25.0 mu g/m(3). The absolute ceiling for mercury vapor, not to be exceeded at any time, is 125.0 mu g/m(3). When both water spray and suction were used, mercury vapor levels were consistently below this threshold. When suction without water spray was used, mercury vapor levels exceeded the safety threshold 8% of the time. When neither water spray nor suction was used, 36% of the mercury vapor readings exceeded the absolute ceiling value. To maximize safety, dental schools should train students to remove amalgam only while using water spray and high volume suction. Alternatively, students should use appropriate occupational hygiene personal protective equipment during amalgam removals.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mercury vapour exposure during dental student training in amalgam removal
    Robin Warwick
    Andrea O’Connor
    Brianne Lamey
    [J]. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 8
  • [2] Mercury vapour exposure: a study of dental student
    Eoin R Smart
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2001, 191 (8) : 445 - 445
  • [3] EXPOSURE TO MERCURY AND SILVER DURING REMOVAL OF AMALGAM RESTORATIONS
    BRUNE, D
    HENSTENPETTERSEN, A
    BELTESBREKKE, H
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1980, 88 (05): : 460 - 463
  • [4] Dental amalgam mercury exposure in rats
    Galic, N
    Prpic-Mehicic, G
    Prester, L
    Blanusa, M
    Krnic, Z
    Ferencic, Z
    [J]. BIOMETALS, 1999, 12 (03) : 227 - 231
  • [5] Dental amalgam mercury exposure in rats
    Nada Galic
    Goranka Prpic-Mehičic
    Ljerka Prester
    Maja Blanuša
    Žarka Krnic
    Željko Ferenčic
    [J]. Biometals, 1999, 12 : 227 - 231
  • [6] Effect of rubber dam on mercury exposure during amalgam removal
    Kremers, L
    Halbach, S
    Willruth, H
    Mehl, A
    Welzl, G
    Wack, FX
    Hickel, R
    Greim, H
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 1999, 107 (03) : 202 - 207
  • [7] MERCURY-VAPOR RELEASE DURING INSERTION AND REMOVAL OF DENTAL AMALGAM
    POWELL, LV
    JOHNSON, GH
    YASHAR, M
    BALES, DJ
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 1994, 19 (02) : 70 - 74
  • [8] MERCURY-VAPOR EXPOSURE OF DENTAL STUDENTS DURING AMALGAM PROCEDURES
    HINKELMAN, KW
    COLLINSON, DM
    RIX, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 128 - 128
  • [9] DENTAL AMALGAM .2. EXPOSURE TO MERCURY
    STADTLER, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1991, 29 (04) : 164 - 167
  • [10] MERCURY-VAPOR EXPOSURE TO THE PRACTITIONER DURING AMALGAM PLACEMENT AND REMOVAL
    VALLEJO, E
    GONZALES, R
    WEISEL, C
    FELDMAN, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 129 - 129