Initiation of DNA double strand break repair: signaling and single-stranded resection dictate the choice between homologous recombination, non-homologous end-joining and alternative end-joining

被引:1
|
作者
Grabarz, Anastazja [1 ]
Barascu, Aurelia [1 ]
Guirouilh-Barbat, Josee [1 ]
Lopez, Bernard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Sud, CNRS, UMR 8200, Lab Stabilite Genet & Oncogenese, F-94805 Villejuif, France
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH | 2012年 / 2卷 / 03期
关键词
DNA double strand break; Homologous recombination; Non homologous end joining; alternative end-joining; Resection; chromatin remodeling; genetic instability; genome rearrangements; HISTONE H2AX PHOSPHORYLATION; GENE CONVERSION; BINDING PROTEIN; LIGASE-III; CHROMOSOMAL SEQUENCES; KU80-DEFICIENT CELLS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; DAMAGE CHECKPOINT; EXONUCLEASE; BRCA1;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A DNA double strand break (DSB) is a highly toxic lesion, which can generate genetic instability and profound genome rearrangements. However, DSBs are required to generate diversity during physiological processes such as meiosis or the establishment of the immune repertoire. Thus, the precise regulation of a complex network of processes is necessary for the maintenance of genomic stability, allowing genetic diversity but protecting against genetic instability and its consequences on oncogenesis. Two main strategies are employed for DSB repair: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). HR is initiated by single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) resection and requires sequence homology with an intact partner, while NHEJ requires neither resection at initiation nor a homologous partner. Thus, resection is an pivotal step at DSB repair initiation, driving the choice of the DSB repair pathway employed. However, an alternative end-joining (A-EJ) pathway, which is highly mutagenic, has recently been described; A-EJ is initiated by ssDNA resection but does not require a homologous partner. The choice of the appropriate DSB repair system, for instance according the cell cycle stage, is essential for genome stability maintenance. In this context, controlling the initial events of DSB repair is thus an essential step that may be irreversible, and the wrong decision should lead to dramatic consequences. Here, we first present the main DSB repair mechanisms and then discuss the importance of the choice of the appropriate DSB repair pathway according to the cell cycle phase. In a third section, we present the early steps of DSB repair i.e., DSB signaling, chromatin remodeling, and the regulation of ssDNA resection. In the last part, we discuss the competition between the different DSB repair mechanisms. Finally, we conclude with the importance of the fine tuning of this network for genome stability maintenance and for tumor protection in fine.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 268
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Differential usage of non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination in double strand break repair
    Sonoda, Eiichiro
    Hochegger, Helfrid
    Saberi, Alihossein
    Taniguchi, Yoshihito
    Takeda, Shunichi
    DNA REPAIR, 2006, 5 (9-10) : 1021 - 1029
  • [2] Arabidopsis DNA double strand break repair by non-homologous end-joining
    West, C. E.
    Dean, P. J.
    Waterworth, W. M.
    Sunderland, P. A.
    Bray, C. M.
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY A-MOLECULAR & INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 141 (03): : S287 - S287
  • [3] DNA double strand break repair via non-homologous end-joining
    Davis, Anthony J.
    Chen, David J.
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 2 (03) : 130 - 143
  • [4] Inhibition of homologous recombination by hyperthermia shunts early double strand break repair to non-homologous end-joining
    Bergs, Judith W. J.
    Krawczyk, Przemek M.
    Borovski, Tijana
    ten Cate, Rosemarie
    Rodermond, Hans M.
    Stap, Jan
    Medema, Jan Paul
    Haveman, Jaap
    Essers, Jeroen
    van Bree, Chris
    Stalpers, Lukas J. A.
    Kanaar, Roland
    Aten, Jacob A.
    Franken, Nicolaas A. P.
    DNA REPAIR, 2013, 12 (01) : 38 - 45
  • [5] Genetic analysis of chromosomal double-strand break repair by non-homologous end-joining
    Willers, H
    Powell, SN
    Dahm-Daphi, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01): : S345 - S345
  • [6] DNA non-homologous end-joining enters the resection arena
    Jeggo, Penny A.
    Loebrich, Markus
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (55) : 93317 - 93318
  • [7] Alternative end-joining repair pathways are the ultimate backup for abrogated classical non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination repair: Implications for the formation of chromosome translocations
    Iliakis, George
    Murmann, Tamara
    Soni, Aashish
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2015, 793 : 166 - 175
  • [8] Double Strand Break DNA Repair occurs via Non-Homologous End-Joining in Mouse MII Oocytes
    Martin, Jacinta H.
    Bromfield, Elizabeth G.
    Aitken, R. John
    Lord, Tessa
    Nixon, Brett
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [9] Effects of chemopreventive natural products on non-homologous end-joining DNA double-strand break repair
    Charles, Catherine
    Nachtergael, Amandine
    Ouedraogo, Moustapha
    Belayew, Alexandra
    Duez, Pierre
    MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2014, 768 : 33 - 41
  • [10] Double Strand Break DNA Repair occurs via Non-Homologous End-Joining in Mouse MII Oocytes
    Jacinta H. Martin
    Elizabeth G. Bromfield
    R. John Aitken
    Tessa Lord
    Brett Nixon
    Scientific Reports, 8