Do guidelines offer implementation advice to target users? A systematic review of guideline applicability

被引:110
|
作者
Gagliardi, Anna R. [1 ]
Brouwers, Melissa C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; CRITICAL-APPRAISAL; ASTHMA GUIDELINES; CARE; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; DISEASE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007047
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Providers and patients are most likely to use and benefit from guidelines accompanied by implementation support. Guidelines published in 2007 and earlier assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument scored poorly for applicability, which reflects the inclusion of implementation instructions or tools. The purpose of this study was to examine the applicability of guidelines published in 2008 or later and identify factors associated with applicability. Design: Systematic review of studies that used AGREE to assess guidelines published in 2008 or later. Data sources: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from 2008 to July 2014, and the reference lists of eligible items. Two individuals independently screened results for English language studies that reviewed guidelines using AGREE and reported all domain scores, and extracted data. Descriptive statistics were calculated across all domains. Multilevel regression analysis with a mixed effects model identified factors associated with applicability. Results: Of 245 search results, 53 were retrieved as potentially relevant and 20 studies were eligible for review. The mean and median domain scores for applicability across 137 guidelines published in 2008 or later were 43.6% and 42.0% (IQR 21.8-63.0%), respectively. Applicability scored lower than all other domains, and did not markedly improve compared with guidelines published in 2007 or earlier. Country (UK) and type of developer (disease-specific foundation, non-profit healthcare system) appeared to be associated with applicability when assessed with AGREE II (not original AGREE). Conclusions: Despite increasing recognition of the need for implementation tools, guidelines continue to lack such resources. To improve healthcare delivery and associated outcomes, further research is needed to establish the type of implementation tools needed and desired by healthcare providers and consumers, and methods for developing high-quality tools.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Developing a checklist for guideline implementation planning: review and synthesis of guideline development and implementation advice
    Gagliardi, Anna R.
    Marshall, Catherine
    Huckson, Sue
    James, Roberta
    Moore, Val
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
  • [2] Developing a checklist for guideline implementation planning: review and synthesis of guideline development and implementation advice
    Anna R Gagliardi
    Catherine Marshall
    Sue Huckson
    Roberta James
    Val Moore
    [J]. Implementation Science, 10
  • [3] Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review
    Anna R Gagliardi
    Samia Alhabib
    [J]. Implementation Science, 10 (1)
  • [4] Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review
    Gagliardi, Anna R.
    Alhabib, Samia
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
  • [5] Effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies: systematic review of systematic reviews
    Durieux, P
    Ravaud, P
    Dosquet, P
    Durocher, A
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2000, 24 (11): : 1018 - 1025
  • [6] The Quality and Clinical Applicability of Recommendations in Ostomy Guidelines: A Systematic Review
    Li, Jiamin
    Zhang, Qiuwen
    Wu, Xinjuan
    Pang, Dong
    [J]. RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2022, 15 : 1517 - 1529
  • [7] Improving the Applicability and Feasibility of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Primary Care: Recommendations for Guideline Development and Implementation
    Han, Lu
    Zeng, Linan
    Duan, Yanjun
    Chen, Kexin
    Yu, Jiajie
    Li, Honghao
    Yi, Qiusha
    Li, Youping
    Zhang, Lingli
    [J]. RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2021, 14 : 3473 - 3482
  • [8] Stimulating implementation of clinical practice guidelines in hospital care from a central guideline organization perspective: A systematic review
    Thoonsen, Andrea C.
    van Schoten, Steffie M.
    Merten, Hanneke
    van Beusekom, Ilse
    Schoonmade, Linda J.
    Delnoij, Diana M. J.
    de Bruijne, Martine C.
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2024, 148
  • [9] Lifestyle advice and interventions for cardiovascular risk reduction: A systematic review of guidelines
    Khanji, Mohammed Y.
    van Waardhuizen, Claudia N.
    Bicalho, Vinicius V. S.
    Ferket, Bart S.
    Hunink, M. G. Myriam
    Petersen, Steffen E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 263 : 142 - 151
  • [10] Economic evaluation of guideline implementation in primary care: a systematic review
    Kovacs, Eva
    Wang, Xiaoting
    Strobl, Ralf
    Grill, Eva
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2020, 32 (01) : 1 - 11