Impact of Proctoring Environments on Student Performance: Online vs Offline Proctored Exams

被引:20
|
作者
Lee, Jung Wan [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ AUFE, Sch Int Econ & Trade, 962 Caoshan Rd, Bengbu City 233030, Anhui, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Online Proctoring; Offline Proctoring; Online Education; Online Assessment; Academic Achievement; Student Performance; PREFERENCES; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no8.653
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper examines the impact of proctoring environments on student performance in two different exam proctoring environments: online versus offline proctored exams. This study employs a set of aggregated data from 1,762 students over the eight-year period from 2009 to 2016 in a university. Although there were nine courses offered, they could have been counted more than once as students may appear several times to take exams for different courses. This study employs independent samples t-test and regression analysis to compare the means of two independent groups and to test the hypothesis. The results of the independent samples t-test and the regression analysis indicate that there is no difference in the mean scores of exams and, therefore, the findings suggest that the exam proctoring environment is unlikely related to student performance even when students take their exams either in online proctoring or offline proctoring environments. This study concludes that the proctoring environment unlikely results in a statistically significant difference of exam scores and, thus, the exam proctoring environment does not appear to cause any change in student performance. The findings suggest that the exam proctoring environments does not appear to impact on student academic achievements and assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 660
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing Student Performance on Proctored and Non-Proctored Exams in Online Psychology Courses
    Daffin, Lee William, Jr.
    Jones, Ashley A.
    ONLINE LEARNING, 2018, 22 (01): : 131 - 145
  • [2] Proctored Versus Unproctored Online Exams: Studying the Impact of Exam Environment on Student Performance
    Hollister, Kimberly K.
    Berenson, Mark L.
    DECISION SCIENCES-JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE EDUCATION, 2009, 7 (01) : 271 - 294
  • [3] Online proctored exams: rhetoric vs reality
    Nicola-Richmond, Kelli
    Dawson, Phillip
    Partridge, Helen
    HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 43 (02) : 392 - 405
  • [4] Proctored vs Unproctored Online Exams in Language Courses: A Comparative Study
    Celikbag, Mehmet Ali
    Delialioglu, Omer
    29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION (ICCE 2021), VOL I, 2021, : 533 - 538
  • [5] Student exam performance in different proctored environments: Evidence from an online economics course
    Wuthisatian, Rattaphon
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS EDUCATION, 2020, 35
  • [6] ONLINE PROCTORED EXAMS: WHERE AND HOW ARE THEY USED? BASICS, PRACTICAL SCENARIOS AND TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS FOR ONLINE PROCTORING AT EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES AND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
    Baume, Matthias
    13TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2019), 2019, : 5216 - 5225
  • [7] Interaction of Proctoring and Student Major on Online Test Performance
    Alessio, Helaine M.
    Malay, Nancy
    Maurer, Karsten
    Bailer, A. John
    Rubin, Beth
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN OPEN AND DISTRIBUTED LEARNING, 2018, 19 (05): : 165 - 185
  • [8] Comparison of student performance in online proctored and in campus summative assessments
    Saeed, Gulshan Ara
    Amir, Fouzia
    Zaheer, Ahmad Sultan
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 46 (04): : 955 - 958
  • [9] Effect of online practice exams on student performance
    Zhang, Muxin
    Engel, Andrew
    Stelzer, Tim
    Morphew, Jason W.
    2019 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2019, : 682 - 686
  • [10] PERFORMANCE AND CHEATING IN ONLINE EXAMS: A STUDENT'S PERSPECTIVE
    Frei, Georgina V.
    NASLEDE, 2022, 19 (53): : 129 - 150