Artificial intelligence-based preoperative prediction system for diagnosis and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: A multicenter study

被引:7
|
作者
Wu, Meixuan [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Yaqian [2 ]
Dong, Xuhui [3 ]
Jin, Yue [2 ]
Cheng, Shanshan [2 ]
Zhang, Nan [2 ]
Xu, Shilin [2 ]
Gu, Sijia [2 ]
Wu, Yongsong [2 ]
Yang, Jiani [1 ]
Yao, Liangqing [3 ]
Wang, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Matern & Infant Hosp 1, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Renji Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
artificial intelligence; epithelial ovarian cancer; blood biomarkers; diagnosis; prognosis; SHAP value; MACHINE; MORTALITY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.975703
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundOvarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, with limited early screening methods and poor prognosis. Artificial intelligence technology has made a great breakthrough in cancer diagnosis. PurposeWe aim to develop a specific interpretable machine learning (ML) prediction model for the diagnosis and prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) based on a variety of biomarkers. MethodsA total of 521 patients with EOC and 144 patients with benign gynecological diseases were enrolled including derivation datasets and an external validation cohort. The predicted information was acquired by 9 supervised ML methods, through 34 parameters. Behind predicted reasons for the best ML were improved by using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm. In addition, the prognosis of EOC was analyzed by unsupervised clustering and Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis. ResultsML technology was superior to conventional logistic regression in predicting EOC diagnosis and XGBoost performed best in the external validation datasets. The AUC values of distinguishing EOC and benign disease patients, determining pathological type, grade and clinical stage were 0.958 (0.926-0.989), 0.792 (0.701-0.8834), 0.819 (0.687-0.950) and 0.68 (0.573-0.788) respectively. For negative CA-125 EOC patients, the AUC performance of XGBoost model was 0.835(0.763-0.907). We used unsupervised cluster analysis to identify EOC subgroups with significantly poor overall survival (p-value <0.0001) and recurrence-free survival (p-value <0.0001). ConclusionsBased on the preoperative characteristics, we proved that ML algorithm can provide an acceptable diagnosis and prognosis prediction model for EOC patients. Meanwhile, SHAP analysis can improve the interpretability of ML models and contribute to precision medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial intelligence-based model enables accurate diagnosis of ovarian cancer using laboratory tests: a multicenter, retrospective study
    Liu, Jihong
    Cai, Guangyao
    Zhang, Han
    Huang, Fangjun
    Gao, Yue
    Li, Xiao
    Gao, Qinglei
    Zhen, Xin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 (SUPPL_4) : A212 - A213
  • [2] Editorial: Artificial intelligence-based medical image automatic diagnosis and prognosis prediction
    Yan, Junchi
    Lai, Yukun
    Xu, Yi
    Zheng, Yinqiang
    Niu, Zhibin
    Tan, Tao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2023, 11
  • [3] Application of Artificial Intelligence for Preoperative Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Based on Blood Biomarkers
    Kawakami, Eiryo
    Tabata, Junya
    Yanaihara, Nozomu
    Ishikawa, Tetsuo
    Koseki, Keita
    Iida, Yasushi
    Saito, Misato
    Komazaki, Hiromi
    Shapiro, Jason S.
    Goto, Chihiro
    Akiyama, Yuka
    Saito, Ryosuke
    Saito, Motoaki
    Takano, Hirokuni
    Yamada, Kyosuke
    Okamoto, Aikou
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 25 (10) : 3006 - 3015
  • [4] Cancer Prognosis Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Techniques
    Surbhi Gupta
    Yogesh Kumar
    [J]. SN Computer Science, 2022, 3 (1)
  • [5] Artificial Intelligence-Based Breast and Cervical Cancer Diagnosis and Management System
    Zewde, Elbetel Taye
    Degu, Mizanu Zelalem
    Simegn, Gizeaddis Lamesgin
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DIGITALIZATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, ICAST 2022, 2023, 455 : 79 - 94
  • [6] Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis of the depth of laryngopharyngeal cancer
    Yumii, Kohei
    Ueda, Tsutomu
    Kawahara, Daisuke
    Chikuie, Nobuyuki
    Taruya, Takayuki
    Hamamoto, Takao
    Takeno, Sachio
    [J]. AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2024, 51 (02) : 417 - 424
  • [7] Artificial Intelligence-Based System for Retinal Disease Diagnosis
    Orlova, Ekaterina V.
    [J]. ALGORITHMS, 2024, 17 (07)
  • [8] Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis of standard endoscopic ultrasonography scanning sites in the biliopancreatic system: a multicenter retrospective study
    Tian, Shuxin
    Shi, Huiying
    Chen, Weigang
    Li, Shijie
    Han, Chaoqun
    Du, Fan
    Wang, Weijun
    Wen, Hongxu
    Lei, Yali
    Deng, Liang
    Tang, Jing
    Zhang, Jinjie
    Lin, Jianjiao
    Shi, Lei
    Ning, Bo
    Zhao, Kui
    Miao, Jiarong
    Wang, Guobao
    Hou, Hui
    Huang, Xiaoxi
    Kong, Wenjie
    Jin, Xiaojuan
    Ding, Zhen
    Lin, Rong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (03) : 1637 - 1644
  • [9] Artificial intelligence in pathologic diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of prostate cancer
    Zhu, Min
    Sali, Rasoul
    Baba, Firas
    Khasawneh, Hamdi
    Ryndin, Michelle
    Leveillee, Raymond J.
    Hurwitz, Mark
    Lui, Kin
    Dixon, Christopher
    Zhang, David Y.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL UROLOGY, 2024, 12 (04): : 200 - 215
  • [10] Artificial intelligence-based droplet size prediction for microfluidic system
    Dubey, Sameer
    Vishwakarma, Pradeep
    Ramarao, T. V. S.
    Dubey, Satish Kumar
    Goel, Sanket
    Javed, Arshad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL METHODS FOR HEAT & FLUID FLOW, 2024, 34 (08) : 3045 - 3078