Controversies in migraine: monotherapy

被引:4
|
作者
D'Amico, Domenico [1 ]
机构
[1] Carlo Besta Neurol Inst IRCCS Fdn, Clin Neurosci Dept, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Migraine; Prophylaxis; Monotherapy; Polytherapy; Combination; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; DOUBLE-BLIND; PREVENTIVE TREATMENT; TOPIRAMATE; COMBINATION; PREVALENCE; HEADACHE; THERAPY; BURDEN; NORTRIPTYLINE;
D O I
10.1007/s10072-012-1059-0
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Migraine patients with frequent and severe headaches need prophylaxis. The most used approach is monotherapy, i.e. one of the available preventive compounds is prescribed to the patient, testing its efficacy and tolerability during a treatment period of some months. Some clinicians use to add a second (or even a third) preventive compound to improve the effects of pharmacological prophylaxis, using an approach that can be defined as polytherapy. In this paper, the main advantages of monotherapy are briefly reviewed, taking into account several aspects: published evidence on polytherapy; the possibility to evaluate the adverse events of the prescribed treatment and to assess its real efficacy; the possibility of addressing different patient's needs, particularly the treatment of comorbidities and the development of an effective patient-physician communication.
引用
收藏
页码:S141 / S145
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条