An Evaluation Model of Quantitative and Qualitative Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Location Selection of Transshipment Ports

被引:8
|
作者
Ding, Ji-Feng [1 ]
Chou, Chien-Chang [2 ]
机构
[1] Chang Jung Christian Univ, Dept Aviat & Maritime Transportat Management, Tainan 71101, Taiwan
[2] Natl Kaohsiung Marine Univ, Dept Shipping Technol, Kaohsiung 80543, Taiwan
关键词
FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; LOGISTICS HUB; MCDM APPROACH; HONG-KONG; SHANGHAI; CENTERS;
D O I
10.1155/2013/783105
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The role of container logistics centre as home bases for merchandise transportation has become increasingly important. The container carriers need to select a suitable centre location of transshipment port to meet the requirements of container shipping logistics. In the light of this, the main purpose of this paper is to develop a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to evaluate the best selection of transshipment ports for container carriers. At first, some concepts and methods used to develop the proposed model are briefly introduced. The performance values of quantitative and qualitative subcriteria are discussed to evaluate the fuzzy ratings. Then, the ideal and anti-ideal concepts and the modified distance measure method are used in the proposed model. Finally, a step-by-step example is illustrated to study the computational process of the quantitative and qualitative fuzzy MCDM model. The proposed approach has successfully accomplished our goal. In addition, the proposed fuzzy MCDM model can be empirically employed to select the best location of transshipment port for container carriers in the future study.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An Evaluation Model of Quantitative and Qualitative Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Hydroelectric Plant Location Selection
    Chien, Fengsheng
    Wang, Chia-Nan
    Viet Tinh Nguyen
    Van Thanh Nguyen
    Chau, Ka Yin
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (11)
  • [2] SUPPLIER EVALUATION AND SELECTION: A FUZZY NOVEL MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP DECISION-MAKING APPROACH
    Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov
    Varela, Maria Leonilde
    Putnik, Goran
    Avila, Paulo
    Agyemang, John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2018, 12 (02) : 459 - 486
  • [3] A multi-criteria decision-making methodology on the selection of facility location: fuzzy ANP
    Aşkın Özdağoğlu
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 59 : 787 - 803
  • [4] A multi-criteria decision-making methodology on the selection of facility location: fuzzy ANP
    Ozdagoglu, Askin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 59 (5-8): : 787 - 803
  • [5] Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making TOPSIS for Distribution Center Location Selection
    Hu, Yaodong
    Wu, Shuyan
    Cai, Liya
    [J]. NSWCTC 2009: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKS SECURITY, WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND TRUSTED COMPUTING, VOL 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 707 - +
  • [6] Unsupervised feature selection: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dowlatshahi, M. B.
    Hashemi, A.
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2023, 20 (07): : 55 - 70
  • [7] Applying fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model to ecotour plan selection
    Chi-Shiun Lai
    Hong-Long Lee
    Yen-Chih Pan
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2013, 47 : 1125 - 1141
  • [8] Applying fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model to ecotour plan selection
    Lai, Chi-Shiun
    Lee, Hong-Long
    Pan, Yen-Chih
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2013, 47 (02) : 1125 - 1141
  • [9] A Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Approach for Facility Location Selection Using PROMETHEE Under a Fuzzy Environment
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza
    Sotoudeh-Anvari, Alireza
    Siadat, Ali
    [J]. OUTLOOKS AND INSIGHTS ON GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, GDN 2015, 2015, 218 : 145 - 156
  • [10] Hybrid Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach for Supplier Evaluation in Fuzzy Environment
    Bhayana, Nidhi
    Gandhi, Kanika
    Jha, P. C.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING (SOCPROS 2015), VOL 2, 2016, 437 : 991 - 1009