The Paris Agreement zero-emissions goal is not always consistent with the 1.5 °C and 2 °C temperature targets

被引:110
|
作者
Tanaka, Katsumasa [1 ]
O'Neill, Brian C. [2 ]
机构
[1] NIES, Ctr Global Environm Res, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[2] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Climate & Global Dynam Lab, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
关键词
GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIALS; CARBON-DIOXIDE; CLIMATE; SCENARIOS; METRICS; SCIENCE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1038/s41558-018-0097-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Paris Agreement stipulates that global warming be stabilized at well below 2 degrees C above pre-industrial levels, with aims to further constrain this warming to 1.5 degrees C. However, it also calls for reducing net anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to zero during the second half of this century. Here, we use a reduced-form integrated assessment model to examine the consistency between temperature-and emission-based targets. We find that net zero GHG emissions are not necessarily required to remain below 1.5 degrees C or 2 degrees C, assuming either target can be achieved without overshoot. With overshoot, however, the emissions goal is consistent with the temperature targets, and substantial negative emissions are associated with reducing warming after it peaks. Temperature targets are put at risk by late achievement of emissions goals and the use of some GHG emission metrics. Refinement of Paris Agreement emissions goals should include a focus on net zero CO2-not GHG-emissions, achieved early in the second half of the century.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Paris Agreement zero-emissions goal is not always consistent with the 1.5 °C and 2 °C temperature targets
    Katsumasa Tanaka
    Brian C. O’Neill
    Nature Climate Change, 2018, 8 : 319 - 324
  • [2] Institutional decarbonization scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5 °C goal
    Brecha, Robert J.
    Ganti, Gaurav
    Lamboll, Robin D.
    Nicholls, Zebedee
    Hare, Bill
    Lewis, Jared
    Meinshausen, Malte
    Schaeffer, Michiel
    Smith, Christopher J.
    Gidden, Matthew J.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [3] Institutional decarbonization scenarios evaluated against the Paris Agreement 1.5 °C goal
    Robert J. Brecha
    Gaurav Ganti
    Robin D. Lamboll
    Zebedee Nicholls
    Bill Hare
    Jared Lewis
    Malte Meinshausen
    Michiel Schaeffer
    Christopher J. Smith
    Matthew J. Gidden
    Nature Communications, 13
  • [4] Assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation pathways for Thailand towards achievement of the 2°C and 1.5°C Paris Agreement targets
    Rajbhandari, Salony
    Limmeechokchai, Bundit
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2021, 21 (04) : 492 - 513
  • [5] Water availability in Pakistan from Hindukush-Karakoram-Himalayan watersheds at 1.5 °C and 2 °C Paris Agreement targets
    ul Hasson, Shabeh
    Saeed, Fahad
    Boehner, Juergen
    Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2019, 131
  • [6] Paleoclimatological Context and Reference Level of the 2°C and 1.5°C Paris Agreement Long-Term Temperature Limits
    Luning, Sebastian
    Vahrenholt, Fritz
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2017, 5
  • [7] 1.5 °C and climate research after the Paris Agreement
    Hulme, Mike
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 6 (03) : 222 - 224
  • [8] 1.5 °C and climate research after the Paris Agreement
    Mike Hulme
    Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6 : 222 - 224
  • [9] Net-zero emission targets for major emitting countries consistent with the Paris Agreement
    Heleen L. van Soest
    Michel G. J. den Elzen
    Detlef P. van Vuuren
    Nature Communications, 12
  • [10] Net-zero emission targets for major emitting countries consistent with the Paris Agreement
    van Soest, Heleen L.
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)