Evaluation of ortogonblender software bone movement tools in bimaxillary orthognatic surgeries performed in dolphin software

被引:0
|
作者
Lobo, Fernanda [1 ]
Iwaki Filho, Liogi [1 ]
Sigua-Rodriguez, Eder Alberto [2 ]
da Silva, Breno Gabriel [3 ]
Tolentino, Elen de Souza [1 ]
Borges, Yana Miranda [4 ]
da Silva, Mariliani Chicarelli [1 ]
Tonin, Renata Hernandes [1 ]
Iwaki, Lilian Cristina Vessoni [1 ]
机构
[1] State Univ Maringa UEM, Dept Dent, Maringa, PR, Brazil
[2] Inst Univ Colegios Colombia, Ctr Invest CICO, Bogota, Colombia
[3] Univ Sao Paulo ESALQ USP, Coll Agr, Dept Exact Sci Luiz De Queiroz, Piracicaba, Brazil
[4] Fed Inst Educ, Sci & Technol Amazonas IFAM, Manaus, Brazil
关键词
3d surgical planning; Cone-beam computed tomography; Orthognathic surgery; SURGICAL SIMULATION CASS; CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL DEFORMITY; ACCURACY; POSITION; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jormas.2021.10.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this observational, longitudinal and retrospective study was to evaluate the fidelity of virtual sur-gical planning (VSP) performed on Dolphin Imaging & Management Solutions (R) 11.95 software on hard tis-sues, using the tools of the open-source software OrtogOnBlender - Blender3D. For this, linear, angular and 7-point anatomical measurements of the skeletal profile were used, and the discrepancies between the VSP and the result after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery were calculated. Pre- and postoperative cone beam CT (CBCT) scans of 43 consecutive patients with class II and III skeletal deformities were evaluated and the results of the VSP were compared to the 1-month postoperative results. All overlapping points presented val-ues within the range considered clinically irrelevant (< 2 mm and < 4 degrees) and differences were not significant (p > 0.05). The comparison of anatomical points showed lower values (<= 2.11 mm) in point A of class II. For hard tissues, the comparison between VSP and 1-month postoperative tomography demonstrated the faithful results of virtual planning using this software. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 421
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Software Tools for Segmentation of Temporal Bone Anatomy
    Hassan, Kowther
    Dort, Joseph C.
    Sutherland, Garnette R.
    Chan, Sonny
    [J]. MEDICINE MEETS VIRTUAL REALITY 22, 2016, 220 : 130 - 133
  • [2] An Evaluation of Free Tools for Software Testing
    Serna, Edgar M.
    Serna, Alexei A.
    [J]. REVISTA VIRTUAL UNIVERSIDAD CATOLICA DEL NORTE, 2012, 37 : 44 - 61
  • [3] Evaluation format for 'open' software tools
    [J]. Comput Hum Behav, 3-4 (619):
  • [4] Evaluation of Software Tools with Deaf Children
    Mich, Ornella
    [J]. ASSETS'09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGACCESS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND ACCESSIBILITY, 2009, : 235 - 236
  • [5] AN EVALUATION FORMAT FOR OPEN SOFTWARE TOOLS
    MURPHY, CA
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1995, 11 (3-4) : 619 - 631
  • [6] A practical strategy for the evaluation of software tools
    Powell, A
    Vickers, A
    Williams, E
    Cooke, B
    [J]. METHOD ENGINEERING: PRINCIPLES OF METHOD CONSTRUCTION AND TOOL SUPPORT, 1996, : 165 - 185
  • [7] ASSESSMENT OF SOFTWARE TOOLS FOR MEASUREMENT OF BONE STRUCTURE
    Riddell, Amy J.
    Loveridge, Nigel
    Edwards, Mark E.
    Dennison, Elaine M.
    Cooper, Cyrus C.
    Ward, Kate A.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 23 : S590 - S591
  • [8] An Evaluation of Current Approaches and Tools for Software Redocumentation Process in Software Maintenance
    Sugumaran, N.
    Ibrahim, S.
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION: A BUSINESS COMPETITIVE EDGE PERSPECTIVE, VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 1369 - 1377
  • [9] Groupware and social software: a framework proposal for analytical evaluation of free software tools
    Tramullas, Jesus
    Garrido-Picazo, Piedad
    Sanchez-Casabon, Ana-Isabel
    [J]. PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2011, 20 (04): : 465 - 473
  • [10] SETE: software tools for the evaluation of team work
    Amengual, E.
    Mas, A.
    Mesquida, A.
    [J]. SISTEMAS Y TECNOLOGIAS DE INFORMACION, 2010, : 314 - 318