Differences in taste between two polyethylene glycol preparations

被引:0
|
作者
Szojda, Maria M. [1 ]
Mulder, Chris J. J. [1 ]
Felt-Bersma, Richelle J. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
polyethylene glycol; laxative; constipation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims. Polyethylene glycol preparations (PEG) are increasingly used for chronic constipation in both adults and children, There are some suggestions that PEG 4000 with orange flavour (Forlax (R)) tastes better than PEG 3350 which contains salt (Movicolon (R)). Poor taste is an important factor for non-compliance and is one of the leading causes of therapy failure. The aim of the study was to compare the taste of two commonly used PEG preparations, PEG 4000 and PEG 3350. Methods. A double-blind, cross over randomised trial. A hundred people were recruited by advertisement. All tasted both preparations without swallowing and after tasting each of the preparations, they rinsed their mouths. Then a score, on a 5-point scale, was given for both preparations. Results. 100 volunteers were included (27 males and 73 females, mean age 36). The taste score for PEG 4000 (mean 3.9, SD 0.7) was significantly better than for PEG 3 350 (mean 2.7, SE) 0.7) (p<0.0001, Wilcoxon matched pairs test). No difference in gender or age was observed. The volunteers which tasted PEG 3350 liked it more, when they tasted it first rather than when they tasted it after PEG 4000 (p<0.0001). The order in which volunteers tested PEG 4000 had no influence on the taste results. Conclusion. PEG 4000 tastes better than PEG 3350. This may have implications for patient compliance and effectiveness of treatment in patients with chronic constipation.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 381
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Differences in taste between three polyethylene glycol preparations: a randomized double-blind study
    Lam, Tze J.
    Mulder, Chris J. J.
    Felt-Bersma, Richelle J. F.
    [J]. PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2011, 5 : 423 - 426
  • [3] Subjective taste to polyethylene glycol is associated with efficacy of right colon preparation
    Park, Seon-Young
    Kim, Dong-Ik
    Kim, Hyun-Soo
    Chung, Jin Ook
    Chung, Min-Woo
    Myung, Eun
    Koh, Han-Ra
    Jun, Chung-Hwan
    Park, Chang-Hwan
    Choi, Sung-Kyu
    Rew, Jong-Sun
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 52 (04) : 373 - 376
  • [4] Is Polyethylene Glycol Superior to Miralax-Gatorade in Bowel Preparations for Colonoscopy?
    Zhang, Zhifeng
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 (04): : 596 - 597
  • [5] BOUNDARY LAYER REACTIONS BETWEEN COLLOID SILICIC ACID, POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL AND POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL DERIVATIVES
    RUPPRECHT, H
    LIEBL, H
    [J]. KOLLOID-ZEITSCHRIFT AND ZEITSCHRIFT FUR POLYMERE, 1970, 239 (02): : 685 - +
  • [6] Comparison of two colonic lavage preparations, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and fleet phosphosoda (FPS) as arrhythmia-inducing agents
    Yousif, EA
    Hanna, M
    Falawee, D
    David, S
    Piper, M
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (04) : AB200 - AB200
  • [7] Differences in taste representation between two primary gustatory areas alert monkeys
    Ogawa, H
    Hirata, SI
    Ifuku, H
    Nakamura, T
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 2006, 31 (01) : J21 - J21
  • [8] A Comparison of Sodium Phosphosoda Purgative to Polyethylene Glycol Bowel Preparations Prior to Colonoscopy
    Brunelli, Steven M.
    Feldman, Harold I.
    Latif, Sherif M.
    Gupta, Meera
    Weiner, Mark G.
    Lewis, James D.
    [J]. FAMILY MEDICINE, 2009, 41 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [9] Efficacy of 1.2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for bowel preparations
    Tamaki, Hiroyuki
    Noda, Teruyo
    Morita, Masahiro
    Omura, Akina
    Kubo, Atsushi
    Ogawa, Chikara
    Matsunaka, Toshihiro
    Shibatoge, Mitsushige
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2019, 7 (04) : 452 - 465
  • [10] INFLUENCE OF MOLECULAR-WEIGHT OF POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL ON INTERACTION BETWEEN POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL AND IODINE
    KANENIWA, N
    IKEKAWA, A
    HAYASE, H
    [J]. CHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN, 1974, 22 (11) : 2635 - 2641