Trial of Nemolizumab and Topical Agents for Atopic Dermatitis with Pruritus

被引:210
|
作者
Kabashima, Kenji [1 ]
Matsumura, Takayo [2 ]
Komazaki, Hiroshi [3 ]
Kawashima, Makoto [4 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Dept Dermatol, Grad Sch Med, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Maruho, Dept Clin Dev, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Maruho, Dept Data Sci, Kyoto, Japan
[4] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Tokyo, Japan
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2020年 / 383卷 / 02期
关键词
SEVERITY INDEX; INTERLEUKIN-31; RECEPTOR; EUROPEAN GUIDELINES; OBJECTIVE SCORAD; ECZEMA AREA; MANAGEMENT; DUPILUMAB; PLACEBO; ADULTS; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa1917006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundNemolizumab is a subcutaneously administered humanized monoclonal antibody against interleukin-31 receptor A, which is involved in pruritus and inflammation in atopic dermatitis. In phase 2 studies, nemolizumab lessened the severity of atopic dermatitis. MethodsIn a 16-week, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned Japanese patients with atopic dermatitis and moderate-to-severe pruritus and an inadequate response to topical agents in a 2:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous nemolizumab (60 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks until week 16, with concomitant topical agents. The primary end point was the mean percent change in the visual-analogue scale (VAS) score for pruritus (range, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse pruritus) from baseline to week 16. Secondary end points included the time course of change in the VAS score for pruritus up to week 4, the change in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score (range, 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating greater severity), a score of 4 or less on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; range, 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating a greater effect on daily life), a score of 7 or less on the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI; range, 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater severity), and safety. ResultsA total of 143 patients were randomly assigned to receive nemolizumab and 72 to receive placebo. The median VAS score for pruritus at baseline was 75. At week 16, the mean percent change in the VAS score was -42.8% in the nemolizumab group and -21.4% in the placebo group (difference, -21.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -30.2 to -12.7; P<0.001). The mean percent change in the EASI score was -45.9% with nemolizumab and -33.2% with placebo. The percentage of patients with a DLQI score of 4 or less was 40% in the nemolizumab group and 22% in the placebo group; the percentage of patients with an ISI score of 7 or less was 55% and 21%, respectively. The incidence of injection-related reactions was 8% with nemolizumab and 3% with placebo. ConclusionsIn this 16-week trial, the use of subcutaneous nemolizumab in addition to topical agents for atopic dermatitis resulted in a greater reduction in pruritus than placebo plus topical agents. The incidence of injection-site reactions was greater with nemolizumab than with placebo. Longer and larger trials are necessary to determine whether nemolizumab has a durable effect and is safe for atopic dermatitis. (Funded by Maruho; JapicCTI number, 173740.) In a 16-week, randomized trial involving patients with atopic dermatitis, the monoclonal antibody nemolizumab was more effective than placebo for the relief of pruritus. The incidence of injection-site reactions was higher with nemolizumab than with placebo.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 150
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trial of Nemolizumab and Topical Agents for Atopic Dermatitis With Pruritus
    Kabashima, K.
    Matsumura, T.
    Komazaki, H.
    Kawashima, M.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2021, 148 : S19 - S19
  • [2] Nemolizumab for atopic dermatitis
    Labib, Angelina
    Vander Does, Ashley
    Yosipovitch, Gil
    [J]. DRUGS OF TODAY, 2022, 58 (04) : 159 - 173
  • [3] A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER TRIAL OF TOPICAL TACROLIMUS FOR TREATMENT OF PRURITUS IN PATIENTS WITH ATOPIC DERMATITIS
    Takeuchi, Satoshi
    Saeki, Hidehisa
    Tokunaga, Shoji
    Torii, Hideshi
    Nakamura, Koichiro
    Soma, Yoshinao
    Hide, Michihiro
    Ohya, Yukihiro
    Sasaki, Rikako
    Kido, Makiko
    Furue, Masutaka
    [J]. ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2009, 89 (06) : 704 - 704
  • [4] Topical agents for the treatment of atopic dermatitis
    Diaz, Aisleen
    Guttman-Yassky, Emma
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 15 (04) : 369 - 382
  • [5] Topical Agents for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis
    Eichenfield, Lawrence F.
    Luger, Thomas
    Papp, Kim
    Silverberg, Jonathan I.
    Sierka, Debra
    Zang, Chuanbo
    Tallman, Anna M.
    Zielinski, Michael A.
    Ports, William C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DRUGS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 19 (01) : 50 - 64
  • [6] Increasing Adherence with Topical Agents for Atopic Dermatitis
    Nupur U. Patel
    Veronica D’Ambra
    Steven R. Feldman
    [J]. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, 2017, 18 : 323 - 332
  • [7] Increasing Adherence with Topical Agents for Atopic Dermatitis
    Patel, Nupur U.
    D'Ambra, Veronica
    Feldman, Steven R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 18 (03) : 323 - 332
  • [8] Pruritus and Atopic Dermatitis
    Darsow, Ulf
    Pfab, Florian
    Valet, Michael
    Huss-Marp, Johannes
    Behrendt, Heidrun
    Ring, Johannes
    Staender, Sonja
    [J]. CLINICAL REVIEWS IN ALLERGY & IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 41 (03) : 237 - 244
  • [9] Pruritus and Atopic Dermatitis
    Ulf Darsow
    Florian Pfab
    Michael Valet
    Johannes Huss-Marp
    Heidrun Behrendt
    Johannes Ring
    Sonja Ständer
    [J]. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, 2011, 41 : 237 - 244
  • [10] Pruritus and Atopic Dermatitis
    Bayerl, Christiane
    [J]. AKTUELLE DERMATOLOGIE, 2016, 42 (12) : 493 - 493