Factors Perceived by Rehabilitation Professionals to Influence the Provision of Assistive Technology to Children: A Systematic Review
被引:11
|
作者:
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
van Niekerk, Karin
[1
]
Dada, Shakila
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Pretoria, Ctr Augmentat & Alternat Commun, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South AfricaUniv Pretoria, Ctr Augmentat & Alternat Commun, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
Dada, Shakila
[1
]
Tonsing, Kerstin
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Pretoria, Ctr Augmentat & Alternat Commun, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South AfricaUniv Pretoria, Ctr Augmentat & Alternat Commun, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
Tonsing, Kerstin
[1
]
Boshoff, Kobie
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ South Australia, Occupat Therapy Program, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaUniv Pretoria, Ctr Augmentat & Alternat Commun, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
Boshoff, Kobie
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Pretoria, Ctr Augmentat & Alternat Commun, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Univ South Australia, Occupat Therapy Program, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Assistive technology;
children with disabilities;
rehabilitation professionals;
ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION;
PHYSICAL-DISABILITIES;
PERCEPTIONS;
PARTICIPATION;
PERSPECTIVES;
THERAPISTS;
SELECTION;
INFANTS;
NEEDS;
D O I:
10.1080/01942638.2017.1337661
中图分类号:
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号:
100202 ;
摘要:
Background: The use of Assistive Technology (AT) by children with disabilities has been associated with significant development and improvement in outcomes within all spheres of life. However, AT is often underutilized. Appropriate selection of AT by rehabilitation professionals could improve the satisfaction of the user and their family with their AT. Data sources: A systematic search identified six studies that investigate the factors that occupational therapists, physiotherapists, as well as speech and language pathologists perceive to influence their provision of AT to children. Study appraisal: Two qualitative and four quantitative articles were identified. Both article types were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal tool (Pluye etal., 2011). Synthesis method: A process of deductive thematic analysis by using themes from the Assistive Technology Device Selection Framework (Scherer etal., 2007), was followed by inductive thematic analysis to uncover subthemes. Data from all six articles are synthesized to provide a view of factors that are perceived to influence AT selection. Implications of findings: Within a family-centered perspective, both family and child expectations and preferences should be considered. Professionals should consider the influence of their own preferences and knowledge on the AT they recommend.