TESSA: A toolkit for rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance

被引:126
|
作者
Peh, Kelvin S. -H. [1 ]
Balmford, Andrew [1 ]
Bradbury, Richard B. [2 ]
Brown, Claire [3 ]
Butchart, Stuart H. M. [4 ]
Hughes, Francine M. R. [5 ]
Stattersfield, Alison [4 ]
Thomas, David H. L. [4 ]
Walpole, Matt [3 ]
Bayliss, Julian [1 ,6 ]
Gowing, David [7 ]
Jones, Julia P. G. [8 ]
Lewis, Simon L. [9 ,12 ]
Mulligan, Mark [10 ]
Pandeya, Bhopal [10 ]
Stratford, Charlie [11 ]
Thompson, Julian R. [12 ]
Turner, Kerry [13 ]
Vira, Bhaskar [14 ]
Willcock, Simon [15 ]
Birch, Jennifer C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Conservat Sci Grp, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[2] Royal Soc Protect Birds, Dept Conservat Sci, Sandy SG19 2DL, Beds, England
[3] United Nations Environm Programme World Conservat, Cambridge CB3 0DL, England
[4] BirdLife Int, Wellbrook Court, Cambridge CB3 0NA, England
[5] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Anim & Environm Res Grp, Cambridge CB1 1PT, England
[6] Fauna & Flora Int, Cambridge CB1 2JD, England
[7] Open Univ, Dept Environm Earth & Ecosyst, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
[8] Univ Bangor, Sch Environm Nat Resources & Geog, Bangor LL57 2UW, Gwynedd, Wales
[9] Univ Leeds, Sch Geog, Leeds LS2 9AT, W Yorkshire, England
[10] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London WC2R 2LS, England
[11] Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford OX10 8BB, Oxon, England
[12] UCL, UCL Dept Geog, London WC1E 6BT, England
[13] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Ctr Social & Econ Res Global Environm, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[14] Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England
[15] Univ Southampton, Inst Life Sci, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
关键词
Climate regulation; Cultivated goods; Ecosystem-service tools; Harvested wild goods; Nature-based recreation; Water-related services;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.003
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Sites that are important for biodiversity conservation can also provide significant benefits (i.e. ecosystem services) to people. Decision makers need to know how change to a site, whether development or restoration, would affect the delivery of services and the distribution army benefits among stakeholders. However, there are relatively few empirical studies that present this information. One reason is the lack of appropriate methods and tools for ecosystem service assessment that do not require substantial resources or specialist technical knowledge, or rely heavily upon existing data. Here we address this gap by describing the Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA). It guides local non-specialists through a selection of relatively accessible methods for identifying which ecosystem services may be important at a site, and for evaluating the magnitude of benefits that people obtain from them currently, compared with those expected under alternative land-uses. The toolkit recommends use of existing data where appropriate and places emphasis on enabling users to collect new field data at relatively low cost and effort. By using TESSA, the users could also gain valuable information about the alternative land-uses; and data collected in the field could be incorporated into regular monitoring programmes. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E51 / E57
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Turner, Will R.
    Brandon, Katrina
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    Costanza, Robert
    da Fonseca, Gustavo A. B.
    Portela, Rosimeiry
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2007, 57 (10) : 868 - 873
  • [2] Assessment of the Ecosystem Services Capacity in Natural Protected Areas for Biodiversity Conservation
    Ronchi, Silvia
    Salata, Stefano
    [J]. WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM - WMCAUS, 2017, 245
  • [3] Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary
    Harrington, Richard
    Anton, Christian
    Dawson, Terence P.
    de Bello, Francesco
    Feld, Christian K.
    Haslett, John R.
    Kluvankova-Oravska, Tatiana
    Kontogianni, Areti
    Lavorel, Sandra
    Luck, Gary W.
    Rounsevell, Mark D. A.
    Samways, Michael J.
    Settele, Josef
    Skourtos, Michalis
    Spangenberg, Joachim H.
    Vandewalle, Marie
    Zobel, Martin
    Harrison, Paula A.
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (10) : 2773 - 2790
  • [4] Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation
    Ridder, Ben
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2008, 17 (04) : 781 - 790
  • [5] Beyond ecosystem services as justification for biodiversity conservation
    Prendergast, Kit S.
    [J]. AUSTRAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 45 (02) : 141 - 143
  • [6] Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation
    Ben Ridder
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2008, 17 : 781 - 790
  • [7] Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary
    Richard Harrington
    Christian Anton
    Terence P. Dawson
    Francesco de Bello
    Christian K. Feld
    John R. Haslett
    Tatiana Kluvánkova-Oravská
    Areti Kontogianni
    Sandra Lavorel
    Gary W. Luck
    Mark D. A. Rounsevell
    Michael J. Samways
    Josef Settele
    Michalis Skourtos
    Joachim H. Spangenberg
    Marie Vandewalle
    Martin Zobel
    Paula A. Harrison
    [J]. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19 : 2773 - 2790
  • [8] Integrating the spatial proximity effect into the assessment of changes in ecosystem services for biodiversity conservation
    Liu, Yanfang
    Zhang, Lei
    Wei, Xiaojian
    Xie, Peng
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 70 : 382 - 392
  • [9] Conservation economics: economic analysis of biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services
    Polasky S.
    [J]. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2009, 10 (1) : 1 - 20
  • [10] Conservation economics: economic analysis of biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services
    Polasky, Stephen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY STUDIES, 2009, 10 (01) : 1 - 20