Assessing patient understanding of their antimicrobial treatment: How are we doing and how might we improve?

被引:6
|
作者
Yeoh, Kim [1 ]
George, Catherine [2 ,3 ]
Rajkhowa, Arjun [3 ,4 ]
Buising, Kirsty [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Victorian Infect Dis Serv, Level 9 North,300 Grattan St, Parkville, Vic 3050, Australia
[2] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Pharm Dept, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, Vic 3050, Australia
[3] Peter Doherty Inst Infect & Immun, Natl Ctr Antimicrobial Stewardship Australia, Level 5,792 Elizabeth St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med & Radiol, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Antimicrobial stewardship; Patient education; Clinical care standard; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT; COMMUNICATION; STEWARDSHIP; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.idh.2020.07.003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Care Standard states that patients should receive certain information about their antimicrobial therapy. How well the patient communication recommendations of the standard are followed in clinical practice is not well established. The aim of this pilot quality improvement study was to assess current practices around communication with hospitalised patients about their antimicrobial therapy, to determine compliance with current recommendations, and develop and implement quality improvement actions focused on patient communication for antimicrobial stewardship in Australia. Methods: Adult inpatients receiving one or more antimicrobials for greater than 72 h were recruited. A survey was conducted to assess rates of compliance with requirements to inform patients about the indication, duration and potential side effects of current antimicrobial therapy; modes of delivery of information; and rates of patient satisfaction with the information provided. A paper-based survey was conducted on the general medical, infectious diseases, geriatric evaluation and management, and rehabilitation wards in a 500-bed tertiary Australian hospital. A sample size of 50 was determined as adequate for a baseline analysis of patient communication practices and the development of quality improvement resources and actions. Responses to categorical questions were analysed quantitatively, with additional feedback from patients was collated and analysed qualitatively. Results: A total of 54 patients were surveyed. A majority (83%) of patients had been informed that they were taking antimicrobials, and, of these, 96% said they knew the indication, 18% were informed of potential side effects, and 36% knew the duration. Only 22% were informed of the review plan and 27% knew if antimicrobials would be continued on discharge. Written information was given to 11% of patients. Over half (62%) of patients either wanted more information or had concerns about their antimicrobial therapy. Patients reported difficulty in obtaining information. Fifty-eight percent of patients received antimicrobial information from doctors, 13% from nurses and 12% from pharmacists. Conclusions: This study identified gaps in communication with patients regarding in-hospital antimicrobial therapy, and highlighted the need for development and delivery of local quality improvement activities to address this gap. (C) 2020 Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 308
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient Engagement: How Are We doing?
    Mullen, Louise
    Hanan, Terry
    Laffoy, Marie
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 : 170 - 170
  • [2] TREATMENT OF PERITONITIS - HOW ARE WE DOING
    VAS, SI
    [J]. PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 15 (06): : 201 - 202
  • [3] Reshaping consent so we might improve participant choice (III) - How is the research participant's understanding currently checked and how might we improve this process?
    Davies, Hugh
    Kolstoe, Simon E.
    Lockett, Anthony
    [J]. RESEARCH ETHICS, 2024, 20 (03) : 604 - 612
  • [4] Understanding Suicide: Why We Don't and How We Might
    Frounfelker, Rochelle
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2010, 34 (02) : 165 - 166
  • [5] Understanding Suicide: Why We Don't and How We Might
    Wodarski, John S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-INFORMED SOCIAL WORK, 2013, 10 (05): : 533 - 534
  • [6] Advance Care Planning and the ACCEPT Study: How Are We Doing and How Can We Improve?
    Barwich, Doris
    You, John
    Heyland, Daren
    Hanvey, Louise
    Baxter, Sharon
    Dodek, Peter
    Lamontagne, Francois
    Tayler, Carolyn
    Porterfield, Pat
    Simon, Jessica
    Enns, Bert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2012, 28 (03) : 194 - 194
  • [7] Communication between anaesthesiologists and patients: how are we doing it now and how can we improve?
    Hool, Alison
    Smith, Andrew F.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 22 (03) : 431 - 435
  • [8] How are we doing?
    Pell, R
    [J]. ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS MAGAZINE, 1998, 41 (02): : 7 - 7
  • [9] How are we doing?
    Briley, R
    Fowler, P
    Teel, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1999, 62 (05) : 35 - 36
  • [10] HOW ARE WE DOING
    不详
    [J]. CONTROL ENGINEERING, 1994, 41 (13) : 20 - 20