Optimal diagnostic fever thresholds using non-contact infrared thermometers under COVID-19

被引:2
|
作者
Lai, Fan [1 ]
Li, Xin [1 ]
Liu, Tianjiao [1 ]
Wang, Xin [1 ]
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Chen, Shan [1 ]
Wei, Sumei [1 ]
Xiong, Ying [1 ]
Hou, Qiannan [1 ]
Zeng, Xiaoyan [1 ]
Yang, Yang [1 ]
Li, Yalan [2 ]
Lin, Yonghong [1 ]
Yang, Xiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Chengdu Womens & Childrens Cent Hosp, Sch Med, Obstet Dept, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Peoples Hosp Chengdu 4, Sch Med, Psychiat Dept, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
coronavirus; epidemiology; body temperature (BT); mass screening; COVID-19; BODY-TEMPERATURE; CIRCADIAN-RHYTHM; CHILDREN; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.985553
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Fever screening is an effective method to detect infectors associated with different variants of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) based on the fact that most infectors with COVID-19 have fever symptoms. Non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) are widely used in fever screening. Nevertheless, authoritative data is lacking in defining "fever" at different body surface sites when using NCITs. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal diagnostic threshold for fever screening using NICTs at different body surface sites, to improve the accuracy of fever screening and provide theoretical reference for healthcare policy. Participants (n = 1860) who were outpatients or emergency patients at Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital were recruited for this prospective investigation from March 1 to June 30, 2021. NCITs and mercury axillary thermometers were used to measure neck, temple, forehead and wrist temperatures of all participants. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to reflect the accuracy of NCITs. Linear correlation analysis was used to show the effect of age on body temperature. Multilinear regression analysis was used to explore the association between non-febrile participant's covariates and neck temperature. The mean age of participants was 3.45 +/- 2.85 years for children and 28.56 +/- 7.25 years for adults. In addition 1,304 (70.1%) participants were children (<= 12), and 683 (36.7%) were male. The neck temperature exhibited the highest accuracy among the four sites. Further the optimal fever diagnostic thresholds of NCITs at the four body surface measurement sites were neck (36.75 degrees C, sensitivity: 0.993, specificity: 0.858); temple (36.55 degrees C, sensitivity: 0.974, specificity: 0.874); forehead (36.45 degrees C, sensitivity: 0.961, specificity: 0.813); and wrist (36.15 degrees C, sensitivity: 0.951, specificity: 0.434). Based on the findings of our study, we recommend 36.15, 36.45, 36.55, and 36.75 degrees C as the diagnostic thresholds of fever at the wrist, forehead, temple and neck, respectively. Among the four surface sites, neck temperature exhibited the highest accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability of Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Fever Screening Under COVID-19
    Lai, Fan
    Li, Xin
    Wang, Qi
    Luo, Yingjuan
    Wang, Xin
    Huang, Xiuhua
    Zhang, Jiajia
    Peng, Jieru
    Wang, Qin
    Fan, Li
    Li, Wen
    Huo, Junrong
    Liu, Tianjiao
    Li, Yalan
    Lin, Yonghong
    Yang, Xiao
    [J]. RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2022, 15 : 447 - 456
  • [2] Non-contact infrared thermometers
    Vernon, Gervase
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 64 (629): : 615 - 615
  • [3] Clinical evaluation of non-contact infrared thermometers
    Sullivan, Stacey J. L.
    Rinaldi, Jean E.
    Hariharan, Prasanna
    Casamento, Jon P.
    Baek, Seungchul
    Seay, Nathanael
    Vesnovsky, Oleg
    Topoleski, L. D. Timmie
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [4] Clinical evaluation of non-contact infrared thermometers
    Stacey J. L. Sullivan
    Jean E. Rinaldi
    Prasanna Hariharan
    Jon P. Casamento
    Seungchul Baek
    Nathanael Seay
    Oleg Vesnovsky
    L. D. Timmie Topoleski
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [5] Digital Axillary and Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers for Children
    Franconi, Ilaria
    La Cerra, Carmen
    Marucci, Anna Rita
    Petrucci, Cristina
    Lancia, Loreto
    [J]. CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (02) : 180 - 190
  • [6] Non-contact Infrared Thermometer for Monitoring Population Temperature Infected with COVID-19
    Mabrouki, Jamal
    Azrour, Mourade
    Boubekraoui, Amina
    Dhiba, Driss
    El Hajjaji, Souad
    [J]. ADVANCED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (AI2SD'2020), VOL 1, 2022, 1417 : 985 - 995
  • [7] Non-contact infrared thermometers for measuring temperature in children: primary care diagnostic technology update
    Wang, Kay
    Gill, Peter
    Wolstenholme, Jane
    Price, Christopher P.
    Heneghan, Carl
    Thompson, Matthew
    Plueddemann, Annette
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 64 (627): : E681 - E683
  • [8] Diagnostic accuracy of non-contact infrared thermometers and thermal scanners: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aggarwal, Nishant
    Garg, Mohil
    Dwarakanathan, Vignesh
    Gautam, Nitesh
    Kumar, Swasthi S.
    Jadon, Ranveer Singh
    Gupta, Mohak
    Ray, Animesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAVEL MEDICINE, 2020, 27 (08)
  • [9] Non-contact tonometer use during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Talwar, Dinesh
    Kumar, Harsh
    Thulasidas, Mithun
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (07) : 1492 - +
  • [10] A Review of the State of the Art in Non-Contact Sensing for COVID-19
    Taylor, William
    Abbasi, Qammer H.
    Dashtipour, Kia
    Ansari, Shuja
    Shah, Syed Aziz
    Khalid, Arslan
    Imran, Muhammad Ali
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (19) : 1 - 19