Uncertainty quantification and propagation in CALPHAD modeling

被引:13
|
作者
Honarmandi, Pejman [1 ]
Paulson, Noah H. [4 ]
Arroyave, Raymundo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stan, Marius [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Mech Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] Argonne Natl Lab, Appl Mat Div, Chicago, IL USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CALPHAD; uncertainty quantification; uncertainty propagation; information fusion; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES; AB-INITIO; HEAT-CAPACITY; K; PHASE; MO; HAFNIUM; OPTIMIZATION; ZIRCONIUM; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1088/1361-651X/ab08c3
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Design is about making decisions bounded by a quantifiable degree of certainty. In the context of alloy design, Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) provides the framework whereby performance requirements are ultimately transformed into alloy/processing specifications through the combination of (complex) computational models connecting process-structure-property-performance relationships and experiments. Most ICME approaches consider the models used as deterministic and thus do not provide the means to make alloy design decisions with proper confidence measures. At the root of ICME lie CALPHAD models that describe the thermodynamics and phase stability of phases under specific thermodynamic boundary conditions. To date, the vast majority of efforts within the CALPHAD community have been deterministic in that thermodynamic models and the resulting thermodynamic properties and phase diagram features do not explicitly account for the uncertainties inherent in the model formulation or in the experimental/computational data used. In this contribution, we provide an overview of the state of the field. We review major efforts thus far and we then provide a (brief) tutorial on basic concepts of uncertainty quantification and propagation (UQ/UP) in CALPHAD. We discuss the major features of frequentist and Bayesian interpretations of uncertainty and proceed with a discussion of recent case studies in which UQ has been used to parameterize models for the thermodynamic properties of phases. We follow our discussion by presenting frameworks and demonstrating the propagation of uncertainty in thermodynamic properties and phase diagram predictions and briefly discuss how we can use Bayesian frameworks for rigorous model selection as well as for model fusion. We close our contribution by providing context for what has been done and what remains to be accomplished in order to fully embrace the management of uncertainty in CALPHAD modeling, a foundational element of ICME.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CALPHAD Uncertainty Quantification and TDBX
    Yu Lin
    Abhinav Saboo
    Ramón Frey
    Sam Sorkin
    Jiadong Gong
    Gregory B. Olson
    Meng Li
    Changning Niu
    [J]. JOM, 2021, 73 : 116 - 125
  • [2] CALPHAD Uncertainty Quantification and TDBX
    Lin, Yu
    Saboo, Abhinav
    Frey, Ramon
    Sorkin, Sam
    Gong, Jiadong
    Olson, Gregory B.
    Li, Meng
    Niu, Changning
    [J]. JOM, 2021, 73 (01) : 116 - 125
  • [3] Bayesian uncertainty quantification and information fusion in CALPHAD-based thermodynamic modeling
    Honarmandi, P.
    Duong, T. C.
    Ghoreishi, S. F.
    Allaire, D.
    Arroyave, R.
    [J]. ACTA MATERIALIA, 2019, 164 : 636 - 647
  • [4] Uncertainty quantification and propagation in the modeling of liquefiable sands
    Mercado, Vicente
    Ochoa-Cornejo, Felipe
    Astroza, Rodrigo
    El-Sekelly, Waleed
    Abdoun, Tarek
    Pasten, Cesar
    Hernandez, Francisco
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 123 : 217 - 229
  • [5] Recent Advances in Surrogate Modeling Methods for Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation
    Wang, Chong
    Qiang, Xin
    Xu, Menghui
    Wu, Tao
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (06):
  • [6] Generalized method of sensitivity analysis for uncertainty quantification in Calphad calculations
    Ury, Nicholas
    Otis, Richard
    Ravi, Vilupanur
    [J]. CALPHAD-COMPUTER COUPLING OF PHASE DIAGRAMS AND THERMOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 79
  • [7] Statistics-based Bayesian modeling framework for uncertainty quantification and propagation
    Ping, Menghao
    Jia, Xinyu
    Papadimitriou, Costas
    Han, Xu
    Jiang, Chao
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2022, 174
  • [8] Modeling, quantification, and mitigation of uncertainty propagation in two-step roundness measurements
    Shi, Shengyu
    Kuschmierz, Robert
    Zhang, Guizhen
    Lin, Jing
    Czarske, Juergen
    Qu, Jinping
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2020, 155
  • [9] Uncertainty Quantification of Propagation in Evaporation Ducting
    Enstedt, M.
    Wellander, N.
    [J]. 2016 URSI INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY (EMTS), 2016, : 794 - 796
  • [10] Uncertainty quantification and propagation with probability boxes
    Duran-Vinuesa, L.
    Cuervo, D.
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 53 (08) : 2523 - 2533