Observations on the legal theory of finance

被引:6
|
作者
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire Business Sch, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
关键词
Law; Money; Finance; Uncertainty; Historical specificity; Essential hybridity; FIRM; LAW; ESSENTIALISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jce.2013.03.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This is a comment on 'Towards a legal theory of finance' by Katharina Pistor. It notes that both law and money are complex and controversial phenomena. They have to be treated as historically specific institutions that arise in the context of fundamental uncertainty. The historical origins of both are briefly considered. It is argued that fundamental uncertainty in the Knight-Keynes sense has been marginalised in modern economics and this creates problems for the theory of money. The comment also expands on the notion of 'essential hybridity' - which signals that money and law are a result of both private arrangements and state intervention. Journal of Comparative Economics 41 (2) (2013) 331-337. Hertfordshire Business School, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK. (C) 2013 Association for Comparative Economic Studies Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 337
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条