Postregistration trials: Should we? How do we?

被引:0
|
作者
Del Sorbo, Lorenzo [1 ]
Thompson, B. Taylor [2 ]
Ranieri, V. Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Osped S Giovanni Battista Molinette, Dipartimento Anestesiol & Rianimaz, Turin, Italy
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Pulm & Crit Care Unit, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
postregistration trials; postmarketing; phase IV; placebo; ethics; sponsored research; activated protein C; drotrecogin alfa; sepsis; septic shock; ACTIVATED PROTEIN-C; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIALS; GUIDELINES RECOMMEND THERAPY; SURVIVING SEPSIS CAMPAIGN; HUMAN MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; DOUBLE-BLIND; SEPTIC SHOCK; CLINICAL-TRIALS; DRUG SAFETY; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181922b9b
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Postregistration trials or postmarketing or phase IV trials are tools to investigate any treatment that is already approved and is, therefore, available for prescription use. The main objectives of these trials are typical effectiveness, more structured surveillance for uncommon or rare side effects, and the potential development of new indications. Several issues need to be addressed in the postregistration phase of the evaluation of a therapeutic treatment. Among those we will focus on two ethical challenges: reporting bias from industry-sponsored research and use of placebo as one of the arms in controlled studies where proven treatment already exists. The review of this topic is particularly relevant in the field of critical care because it is ongoing in the debate about the opportunity to perform a new placebo-controlled study with the recombinant human activated protein C (activated drotrecogin alfa-activated protein C). In fact, despite the approval of activated protein C for treatment of patients with severe sepsis and high risk of death, several issues regarding the efficacy and safety of its administration have been recognized by several investgators to the point that the European Medicines Agency asked for a new placebo-controlled study to further clarify the benefit/risk profile of activated protein C. (Crit Care Med 2009; 37[Suppl.]: S154-S158)
引用
收藏
页码:S154 / S158
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Should we treat pyrexia? And how do we do it?
    James F. Doyle
    Frédérique Schortgen
    [J]. Critical Care, 20
  • [2] Should we treat pyrexia? And how do we do it?
    Doyle, James F.
    Schortgen, Frederique
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 20
  • [3] How do we and how should we deal with uncertainty in endodontics?
    Pigg, Maria
    Broden, Josephine
    Fransson, Helena
    Vareman, Niklas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2022, 55 (04) : 282 - 289
  • [4] CHOLESTEROL POLICY - WHAT SHOULD WE DO - HOW SHOULD WE DECIDE
    KOTTKE, TE
    BREKKE, ML
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (10) : 1023 - 1027
  • [5] Bioanalytical method validation: How much should we do and how should we document?
    Gérard Hopfgartner
    [J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2020, 412 : 531 - 532
  • [6] Bioanalytical method validation: How much should we do and how should we document?
    Hopfgartner, Gerard
    [J]. ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2020, 412 (03) : 531 - 532
  • [7] Clinical trials: what are we afraid of, what should we do?
    Darsaut, Tim E.
    Raymond, Jean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2016, 8 (E1) : E14 - E16
  • [9] How do we make trade policy in Britain? How should we?
    Winters, L. Alan
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2024,
  • [10] How should we assess randomised trials?
    Chen, Patrick
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 (07) : 693 - 694