Experimental and Monte Carlo verification of Acuros XB calculations near low and high density heterogeneities

被引:1
|
作者
Alhakeem, E. [1 ]
AlShaikh, S. [3 ,4 ]
Rosenfeld, A. B. [3 ]
Zavgorodni, S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Dept Phys & Astron, Victoria, BC, Canada
[2] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver Isl Ctr, Dept Med Phys, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[4] Minist Hlth, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.4740086
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of AcurosXB and AAA algorithms near low and high density heterogeneities of different densities using EBT2 film, MOSFET detector “MOSkin” and Monte Carlo calculations using BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc. Three different interfaces were used that included a solid water phantom with 2×2×30cm3 rectangular air gap, rectangular steel insert, and a slab of water embedded between two slabs of lung material. 6MV photon beam with field size of 10×10cm2 was used for the first two geometries and a 3×3cm2‐field was used for the third. Percentage Depth Doses were measured and calculated at the beam central axis. Calculation voxel of 0.1×0.1×0.1cm3 was used by all three algorithms. For all configurations, AcurosXB and AAA agreed to within ±1.3% with MC before the inhomogeneity. The PDD measurements using MOSkin and EBT2 in water, apart from 0.2cm layer near heterogeneity, agreed with the MC within ±2.2%. Within 0.1cm before the water‐air interface AcurosXB and AAA overestimated the dose by 4.7% and 1.6%, respectively. Whereas, in the 0.1cm beyond the air‐water interface, AcurosXB and AAA overestimated the dose by 2.4% and 16.2% respectively. In the 0.1cm before the water‐steel interface, AcurosXB overestimated the dose by 4.7% and AAA underestimated the dose by 9.5%; beyond the steel‐water interface AcurosXB and AAA overestimated the dose by 3.6% and 7.7% respectively. For the lung phantom configuration, AcurosXB and AAA were in agreement with MC within 2% throughout the phantom. These results demonstrate improved performance of AcurosXB as compared to AAA in considered conditions. © 2012, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4619 / 4619
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experimental verification of Acuros XB in the presence of lung-equivalent heterogeneities
    Bueno, M.
    Duch, M. A.
    Jurado-Bruggeman, D.
    Agramunt-Chaler, S.
    Munoz-Montplet, C.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2017, 106 : 357 - 360
  • [2] Dosimetric validation of Acuros® XB with Monte Carlo methods for photon dose calculations
    Bush, K.
    Gagne, I. M.
    Zavgorodni, S.
    Ansbacher, W.
    Beckham, W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (04) : 2208 - 2221
  • [3] Validation of Acuros XB Dose Calculations in SBRT Lung Planning with Monte Carlo Methods
    Bush, K.
    Wang, L.
    Mok, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3816 - 3817
  • [4] On the conversion from dose-to-medium to dose-to-water in heterogeneous phantoms with Acuros XB and Monte Carlo calculations
    Delbaere, Alexia
    Younes, Tony
    Vieillevigne, Laure
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (19):
  • [5] The accuracy of Acuros XB algorithm for radiation beams traversing a metallic hip implant - comparison with measurements and Monte Carlo calculations
    Ojala, Jarkko
    Kapanen, Mika
    Sipila, Petri
    Hyodynmaa, Simo
    Pitkanen, Maunu
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 15 (05): : 162 - 176
  • [6] A Monte Carlo comparison of the Analytic Anisotropic Algorithm vs Acuros XB in cardiac radioablation
    Prusator, Michael T.
    Tucker, Wesley
    Mazur, Tom
    Hugo, Geoffrey
    Goddu, Sreekrishna Murty
    Robinson, Clifford
    Cuculich, Phillip
    Samson, Pamela
    Schmidt, Matthew
    Knutson, Nels
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3433 - S3436
  • [7] Comparison between Acuros XB and Brainlab Monte Carlo algorithms for photon dose calculationVergleich zwischen Acuros-XB- und Brainlab-Monte-Carlo-Algrorithmus zur Dosisberechnung von Photonenstrahlung
    M. Mißlbeck
    P. Kneschaurek
    Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 2012, 188 (7) : 599 - 605
  • [8] Comparison between Acuros XB and Brainlab Monte Carlo algorithms for photon dose calculation
    Misslbeck, M.
    Kneschaurek, P.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 188 (07) : 599 - 605
  • [9] Validation of Acuros XB dose calculation algorithm with Monte Carlo for clinical treatment plans
    Elstrom, U. V.
    Alber, M.
    Soehn, M.
    Hoffmann, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S988 - S989
  • [10] Verification and Evaluation of Acuros XB Dose Calculations for Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy of the Thoracic Spine
    Zhen, H.
    Hrycushko, B.
    Pompos, A.
    Foster, R.
    Yan, Y.
    Stojadinovic, S.
    Solberg, T.
    Gu, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)