Counterintuitive effects of negative social feedback on attention

被引:21
|
作者
Anderson, Brian A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Psychol & Brain Sci, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
Selective attention; social feedback; punishment; aversive conditioning; VISUAL SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SELF-PRIORITIZATION; MONETARY REWARDS; HUMAN VISION; CAPTURE; SALIENCE; STIMULI; SIGNALS; SEARCH; THREAT;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2015.1122576
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Which stimuli we pay attention to is strongly influenced by learning. Stimuli previously associated with reward outcomes, such as money and food, and stimuli previously associated with aversive outcomes, such as monetary loss and electric shock, automatically capture attention. Social reward (happy expressions) can bias attention towards associated stimuli, but the role of negative social feedback in biasing attentional selection remains unexplored. On the one hand, negative social feedback often serves to discourage particular behaviours. If attentional selection can be curbed much like any other behavioural preference, we might expect stimuli associated with negative social feedback to be more readily ignored. On the other hand, if negative social feedback influences attention in the same way that other aversive outcomes do, such feedback might ironically bias attention towards the stimuli it is intended to discourage selection of. In the present study, participants first completed a training phase in which colour targets were associated with negative social feedback. Then, in a subsequent test phase, these same colour stimuli served as task-irrelevant distractors during a visual search task. The results strongly support the latter interpretation in that stimuli previously associated with negative social feedback impaired search performance.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 597
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Negative feedback, political attention, and public policy
    Baekgaard, Martin
    Larsen, Soren K.
    Mortensen, Peter B.
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 97 (01) : 210 - 225
  • [2] Fear of negative evaluation moderates effects of social exclusion on selective attention to social signs
    Tanaka, Hiroaki
    Ikegami, Tomoko
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2015, 29 (07) : 1306 - 1313
  • [3] Effects of Oxytocin and Vasopressin on Preferential Brain Responses to Negative Social Feedback
    Marta Gozzi
    Erica M Dashow
    Audrey Thurm
    Susan E Swedo
    Caroline F Zink
    [J]. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2017, 42 : 1409 - 1419
  • [4] Effects of Oxytocin and Vasopressin on Preferential Brain Responses to Negative Social Feedback
    Gozzi, Marta
    Dashow, Erica M.
    Thurm, Audrey
    Swedo, Susan E.
    Zink, Caroline F.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 42 (07) : 1409 - 1419
  • [5] Attention Training Through Gaze-Contingent Feedback: Effects on Reappraisal and Negative Emotions
    Sanchez, Alvaro
    Everaert, Jonas
    Koster, Ernst H. W.
    [J]. EMOTION, 2016, 16 (07) : 1074 - 1085
  • [6] COUNTERINTUITIVE BEHAVIOR OF SOCIAL SYSTEMS
    FORRESTER, JW
    [J]. THEORY AND DECISION, 1971, 2 (02) : 109 - 140
  • [7] COUNTERINTUITIVE BEHAVIOR OF SOCIAL SYSTEMS
    FORRESTER, JW
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1971, 3 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [8] Social phobia: Effects of external attention on anxiety, negative beliefs, and perspective taking
    Wells, A
    Papageorgiou, C
    [J]. BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1998, 29 (03) : 357 - 370
  • [9] Counterintuitive effects of incentives?
    van den Besselaar, Peter
    Sandstrom, Ulf
    [J]. RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2017, 26 (04) : 349 - 351
  • [10] COUNTERINTUITIVE BEHAVIOR OF SOCIAL SYSTEMS
    FORRESTER, JW
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 1971, 73 (03) : 52 - +