River health assessment in a large river: Bioindicators of fish population

被引:37
|
作者
Jia, Y. T. [1 ]
Chen, Y. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Hydrobiol, Lab Biol Invas & Adapt Evolut, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Large river; Bioindicator; Fish; Population-level metrics; BIOTIC INTEGRITY; BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY; HUMAN DISTURBANCE; INDEX; GRADIENTS; QUALITY; SCALE; IDENTIFICATION; ASSEMBLAGES; DOWNSTREAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.10.011
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Large river systems are some of the most important aquatic resource for human beings. Unfortunately, ecological integrity of large rivers has been altered severely by human activities. To monitor and manage these ecosystems, a large number of fish-based indexes, especially at community-level have been developed in the past decades. However, community-level methods have presented unique challenges in large river assessment. Comparatively, the population-level method could not only avoid the challenges, but also show many other advantages. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to develop and validate a population-based method applicable for large river. The present study was carried out at the Dongjiang River, with Xenocypris davidi and Hemibarbus labeo being selected as the sentinel indicators. In developing our method we sought population metrics, including growth, survival and reproduction related, to reflect ecological characteristics. Candidate biological metrics were screened for stability, responsiveness and redundancy. The metrics of standard length, average age and fecundity were finally selected for X. davidi, and standard length, weight, average age, and gonadosomatic index for H. labeo. Through the relationship between biological traits and catchments human disturbance information, Xunwu and Anyuan were ultimately chosen as the reference sites for X. davidi and H. labeo, respectively. The star plot areas, representing the degree of similarity with the reference conditions, showed a large variation among different sampling sites, ranging from 0.15 to 0.94 for X. davidi and 0.13 to 1.91 for H. labeo. It was indicated that all sampling sites except for XW could be assigned to the "impaired". The publicly available census data were used as independent data set to validate our method. The high agreement of both methods suggested that our method could provide an accurate measure for river ecosystem condition. We believe our methodology would be helpful for water resource management of large river. The methodology established here may also serve as a reference of how to develop a population-based index for similar assessments in other large river systems. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 32
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 6. Bioindicators of fish population health
    Adams, SM
    Bevelhimer, MS
    Greeley, MS
    Levine, DA
    Teh, SJ
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1999, 18 (04) : 628 - 640
  • [2] AN ASSESSMENT OF FISH ASSEMBLAGE STRUCTURE IN A LARGE RIVER
    Kiraly, I. A.
    Coghlan, S. M., Jr.
    Zydlewski, J.
    Hayes, D.
    [J]. RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, 31 (03) : 301 - 312
  • [3] Assessment of fish health status in the Brantas river, Indonesia
    Risjani, Y.
    Musliha, S.
    Hermawati, A.
    Couteau, J.
    Minier, C.
    [J]. COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY A-MOLECULAR & INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 163 (01): : S42 - S42
  • [4] Assessment of fish health status in the Pechora River: Effects of contamination
    Lukin, A.
    Sharova, J.
    Belicheva, L.
    Camus, L.
    [J]. ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2011, 74 (03) : 355 - 365
  • [5] Response of Fish Population Dynamics to Mitigation Activities in a Large Regulated River
    Watkins, Carson J.
    Ross, Tyler J.
    Quist, Michael C.
    Hardy, Ryan S.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY, 2017, 146 (04) : 703 - 715
  • [6] Assessment of a channel catfish population in a large open river system
    Blank, A. J.
    Hamel, M. J.
    Spurgeon, J. J.
    Pegg, M. A.
    [J]. FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (06) : 460 - 468
  • [7] Comparison of Two Sampling Designs for Fish Assemblage Assessment in a Large River
    Kiraly, Ian A.
    Coghlan, Stephen M., Jr.
    Zydlewski, Joseph
    Hayes, Daniel
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY, 2014, 143 (02) : 508 - 518
  • [8] Assessing power of large river fish monitoring programs to detect population changes: the Missouri river sturgeon example
    Wildhaber, M. L.
    Holan, S. H.
    Bryan, J. L.
    Gladish, D. W.
    Ellersieck, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ICHTHYOLOGY, 2011, 27 (02) : 282 - 290
  • [9] RIVER ELECTROFISHING AND FISH POPULATION ESTIMATES
    VINCENT, R
    [J]. PROGRESSIVE FISH-CULTURIST, 1971, 33 (03): : 163 - &
  • [10] Priority habitats for the conservation of large river fish in the Ganges river basin
    Sarkar, Uttam Kumar
    Bain, Mark B.
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2007, 17 (04) : 349 - 359