Sequenom, the US Supreme Court, and Personalized Medicine

被引：0

|

作者：

Kodroff, Cathy A. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Howson & Howson LLP, 350 Sentry Pkwy,Bldg 620,Suite 210, Blue Bell, PA 19422 USA

来源：

HUMAN GENE THERAPY CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT | 2016年 / 27卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1089/humc.2016.29012.kod

中图分类号：

Q81 [生物工程学（生物技术）]; Q93 [微生物学];

学科分类号：

071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

收藏

页码：49 / 52

页数：4

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] US personalized-medicine industry takes hit from Supreme Court
Heidi Ledford
Nature, 2016, 536 : 382 - 382
[2] The US Supreme Court in Mayo v Prometheus - taking the fire from or to biotechnology and personalized medicine?
Minssen, Timo
Nilsson, David
QUEEN MARY JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 2012, 2 (04) : 376 - 388
[3] AMP v Myriad The Supreme Court Gives a Win to Personalized Medicine
Klein, Roger D.
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2013, 15 (06): : 731 - 732
[4] The US Supreme Court
Thompson, Jane
REFERENCE & USER SERVICES QUARTERLY, 2007, 47 (01) : 91 - 92
[5] The US Supreme Court Is Not a Dahlian Court
Baumgardner, Paul
TerBeek, Calvin
STUDIES IN AMERICAN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 36 (02) : 148 - 150
[6] US SUPREME COURT AS PROPHET
BRICKMAN, WW
SCHOOL AND SOCIETY, 1971, 99 (2335): : 330 - 331
[7] US SUPREME COURT ON ABORTION
SIMMS, M
LANCET, 1973, 1 (7802): : 544 - 544
[8] The supreme court and the purposes of medicine
Bloche, MG
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (10): : 993 - 995
[9] US SUPREME COURT ON ABORTION
GOODHART, CB
LANCET, 1973, 1 (7800): : 429 - 429
[10] The institutionalization of the US Supreme Court
McGuire, KT
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2004, 12 (02) : 128 - 142

← 1 2 3 4 5 →