Classical molecular dynamics simulation of electronically non-adiabatic processes

被引:92
|
作者
Miller, William H. [1 ]
Cotton, Stephen J.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Chem, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TRANSITION-STATE THEORY; NONSEPARABLE SYSTEMS; DISSIPATIVE SYSTEMS; QUANTUM DYNAMICS; RATE CONSTANTS; S-MATRIX; EXCITATION; MODEL; TIME;
D O I
10.1039/c6fd00181e
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Both classical and quantum mechanics (as well as hybrids thereof, i.e., semiclassical approaches) find widespread use in simulating dynamical processes in molecular systems. For large chemical systems, however, which involve potential energy surfaces (PES) of general/arbitrary form, it is usually the case that only classical molecular dynamics (MD) approaches are feasible, and their use is thus ubiquitous nowadays, at least for chemical processes involving dynamics on a single PES (i.e., within a single Born-Oppenheimer electronic state). This paper reviews recent developments in an approach which extends standard classical MD methods to the treatment of electronically non-adiabatic processes, i.e., those that involve transitions between different electronic states. The approach treats nuclear and electronic degrees of freedom (DOF) equivalently (i.e., by classical mechanics, thereby retaining the simplicity of standard MD), and provides "quantization" of the electronic states through a symmetrical quasi-classical (SQC) windowing model. The approach is seen to be capable of treating extreme regimes of strong and weak coupling between the electronic states, as well as accurately describing coherence effects in the electronic DOF (including the de-coherence of such effects caused by coupling to the nuclear DOF). A survey of recent applications is presented to illustrate the performance of the approach. Also described is a newly developed variation on the original SQC model (found universally superior to the original) and a general extension of the SQC model to obtain the full electronic density matrix (at no additional cost/complexity).
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 30
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Classical molecular dynamics simulations of electronically non-adiabatic processes
    Miller, William
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [2] Electronically non-adiabatic dynamics in singlet fission: A quasi-classical trajectory simulation
    Tao, Guohua
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [3] A new symmetrical quasi-classical model for electronically non-adiabatic processes: Application to the case of weak non-adiabatic coupling
    Cotton, Stephen J.
    Miller, William H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 145 (14):
  • [4] RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE THEORY OF ELECTRONICALLY NON-ADIABATIC PROCESSES
    MILLER, WH
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1979, (APR): : 265 - 265
  • [5] Electronically non-adiabatic influences in surface chemistry and dynamics
    Wodtke, Alec M.
    [J]. CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS, 2016, 45 (13) : 3641 - 3657
  • [6] Semiclassical initial value representation for electronically non-adiabatic molecular dynamics.
    Sun, X
    Miller, WH
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1997, 213 : 94 - PHYS
  • [7] Molecular-dynamics simulations of non-adiabatic processes at surfaces
    Van Heys, J
    Lindenblatt, M
    Pehlke, E
    [J]. PHASE TRANSITIONS, 2005, 78 (9-11) : 773 - 786
  • [8] Non-adiabatic Matsubara dynamics and non-adiabatic ring-polymer molecular dynamics
    Chowdhury, Sutirtha N.
    Huo, Pengfei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 154 (12):
  • [9] Non-adiabatic molecular dynamics simulations
    Parker, Shane
    Muuronen, Mikko
    Vincent, Jordan
    Roy, Saswata
    Krull, Brandon
    Yu, Jason
    Nguyen, Brian
    Furche, Filipp
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [10] Understanding Electronically Non-Adiabatic Relaxation Dynamics in Singlet Fission
    Tao, Guohua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2015, 11 (01) : 28 - 36