Oral antiarrhythmic drugs in converting recent onset atrial fibrillation

被引:12
|
作者
Deneer, VHM
Borgh, MBI
Kingma, JH
Lie-A-Huen, L
Brouwers, JRBJ
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Clin Pharm, NL-3435 CM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Cardiol, NL-3435 CM Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, GUIDE, Sect Pharmacotherapy, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
来源
PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE | 2004年 / 26卷 / 02期
关键词
atrial fibrillation; amiodarone; antiarrhythmic drugs; digoxin; episodic treatment; flecainide; propafenone; quinidine; sotalol; verapamil;
D O I
10.1023/B:PHAR.0000018593.02291.c0
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim: This article reviews clinical studies on oral antiarrhythmic drugs in converting recent onset atrial fibrillation. An oral loading dose of an antiarrhythmic drug for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation could be an option, due to its simplicity, both for patients admitted to outpatient departments and for episodic treatment by self administration outside the hospital. The latter treatment strategy has recently been pointed out by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association and the European Society of Cardiology as the 'pill in the pocket approach'. Methods: Articles were identified by Medline 1966 to November 2001 and Embase 1966 to November 2001. Randomized studies of oral antiarrhythmic drugs versus placebo or comparative treatment, which are written in the English language, were selected. Non-randomized or non-comparative studies were selected if the results of an analysis to identify predictors for successful conversion are described. The review of clinical trials is followed by a description of pharmacokinetic parameters of the antiarrhythmic drugs. Results: Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were on propafenone, flecainide, sotalol, amiodarone, quinidine, digoxin and verapamil. Conversion rates of a single oral loading dose of 600 mg propafenone varied between 37% and 41% at 4 h after ingestion, Propafenone was more effective than quinidine, amiodarone and placebo. A single oral dose of 300 mg flecainide restored sinus rhythm in 59% and 68% of patients at 3 h. Flecainide was more effective than amiodarone and placebo. Oral sotalol, digoxin and verapamil were not effective in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. Conclusion: Propafenone and flecainide are effective in converting recent onset atrial fibrillation. NO serious ventricular arrhythmia, other serious proarrhythmic effects or serious non cardiac adverse events were observed. Regular supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with 1:1 AV conduction were rare and were also observed in placebo treated patients. Propafenone and flecainide are more effective in patients with atrial fibrillation of less than 24 h. The association between cardioversion and patient characteristics are not consistent between studies. The pharmacokinetics of flecainide, with lower interindividual variability of absorption kinetics, no genetically determined formation of an active metabolite and a more rapid distribution to myocardial tissue, are more favourable for episodic treatment as compared to propafenone. Both flecainide and propafenone are safe in hospitalized patients. Out of hospital self administration of antiarrhythmic drugs, also described as the 'pill in the pocket approach', could be an option for selected patients, after the treatment has proven to be safe in hospital.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 78
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oral antiarrhythmic drugs in converting recent onset atrial fibrillation
    Vera H.M. Deneer
    Marieke B.I. Borgh
    J. Herre Kingma
    Loraine Lie-A-Huen
    Jacobus R.B.J. Brouwers
    [J]. Pharmacy World and Science, 2004, 26 : 66 - 78
  • [2] Acute oral loading of 1C antiarrhythmic drugs on-top of chronic antiarrhythmic therapy in recent onset atrial fibrillation
    Botto, Giovanni L.
    Luzi, Mario
    Russo, Giovanni
    Cappelletti, Giorgio
    Pina, Paolo L.
    Ruffa, Franco
    Bonatti, Roberto
    Butti, Elena
    Lombardi, Rossana
    Ferrari, Giovanni
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (18) : 790 - 790
  • [3] Prevention of atrial fibrillation using antiarrhythmic drugs postcardioversion of new onset atrial fibrillation
    Li, HG
    Riedel, R
    Oldemeyer, B
    Wurdman, R
    Rovang, K
    Hee, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (05) : 82A - 82A
  • [4] Antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation
    Marinelli, Alessandro
    Capucci, Alessandro
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2011, 12 (08) : 1201 - 1215
  • [5] Successful Conversion of Recent-onset Atrial Fibrillation by Sequential Administration of up to Three Antiarrhythmic Drugs
    Milicevic, Goran
    Gavranovic, Zeljka
    Bakula, Miro
    Pazur, Vedran
    Frank, Branimir
    [J]. CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (10) : 472 - 477
  • [6] Comparison of oral loading dose of propafenone and amiodarone for converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation
    Blanc, JJ
    Voinov, C
    Maarek, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 84 (09): : 1029 - 1032
  • [7] Can recent-onset atrial fibrillation be safely and successfully treated with self-administered antiarrhythmic drugs?
    D George Wyse
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine, 2005, 2 : 132 - 133
  • [8] The role of antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation
    Bontempi, Luca
    Vassanelli, Francesca
    Lipari, Alessandro
    Pagnoni, Carlo
    Locantore, Elisa
    ElMaghawry, Mohamed
    Salghetti, Francesca
    Cerini, Manuel
    Curnis, Antonio
    [J]. GIORNALE ITALIANO DI CARDIOLOGIA, 2013, 14 (03) : 76S - 81S
  • [9] Emerging Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation
    Saljic, Arnela
    Heijman, Jordi
    Dobrev, Dobromir
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (08)
  • [10] The Association of With Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation
    Reiffel, James A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 84 (11) : e79 - e79