Shared Decision Making Does Not Influence Physicians against Clinical Practice Guidelines

被引:21
|
作者
Guerrier, Mireille [1 ]
Legare, France [1 ,2 ]
Turcotte, Stephane [1 ]
Labrecque, Michel [1 ]
Rivest, Louis-Paul [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Quebec, Res Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Family Med & Emergency Med, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Dept Math & Stat, Fac Sci & Engn, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
ACUTE RESPIRATORY-INFECTIONS; TRAINING FAMILY PHYSICIANS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; PATIENT PREFERENCES; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; HEALTH-CARE; ANTIBIOTICS; EXERCISE; EFFICACY; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0062537
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: While shared decision making (SDM) and adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are important, some believe they are incompatible. This study explored the mutual influence between physicians' intention to engage in SDM and their intention to follow CPGs. Methods: Embedded within a clustered randomized trial to assess the impact of training physicians in SDM about using antibiotics to treat acute respiratory tract infections, this study evaluated physicians' intentions to both engage in SDM and follow CPGs. A self-administered questionnaire based on the theory of planned behavior evaluated both behavioral intentions and their respective determinants (attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control) at study entry and exit. We used path analysis to explore the relationships between the intentions. We conducted statistical analyses using the maximum likelihood method and the variance-covariance matrix. Goodness of fit indices encompassed the chi-square statistic, the comparative fit index and the root mean square error of approximation. Results: We analyzed 244 responses at entry and 236 at exit. In the control group, at entry we observed that physicians' intention to engage in SDM (r = 0, t = 0.03) did not affect their intention to follow CPGs; however, their intention to follow CPGs (r = -0.31 t = -2.82) did negatively influence their intention to engage in SDM. At exit, neither behavioral intention influenced the other. In the experimental group, at entry neither behavioral intention influenced the other; at exit, the intention to engage in SDM still did not influence the intention to use CPGs, although the intention to follow CPGs (r = -0.15 t = -2.02) slightly negatively influenced the intention to engage in SDM, but this was not clinically significant. Conclusion: Physicians' intention to engage in SDM does not affect their intention to adopt CPGs even after SDM training. Physicians' intention to adopt CPGs had no clinically significant influence on intention to engage in SDM.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Competing norms:: Canadian rural family physicians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making
    Eloivin, Antoine
    Legare, France
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2008, 13 (02) : 79 - 84
  • [2] Shared decision making in clinical practice
    Sandberg, David E.
    [J]. SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 17 : 11 - 11
  • [3] Shared treatment decision making: What does it mean to physicians?
    Charles, CA
    Whelan, T
    Gafni, A
    Willan, A
    Farrell, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (05) : 932 - 936
  • [4] Physicians' awareness and assessment of shared decision making in oncology practice
    Padilla Garrido, Nuria
    Aguado Correa, Francisco
    Bayo Lozano, Eloisa
    Bayo Calero, Juan
    Ortega Moreno, Monica
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA, 2019, 93
  • [5] Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
    Glyn Elwyn
    Dominick Frosch
    Richard Thomson
    Natalie Joseph-Williams
    Amy Lloyd
    Paul Kinnersley
    Emma Cording
    Dave Tomson
    Carole Dodd
    Stephen Rollnick
    Adrian Edwards
    Michael Barry
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2012, 27 : 1361 - 1367
  • [6] Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Frosch, Dominick
    Thomson, Richard
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    Lloyd, Amy
    Kinnersley, Paul
    Cording, Emma
    Tomson, Dave
    Dodd, Carole
    Rollnick, Stephen
    Edwards, Adrian
    Barry, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (10) : 1361 - 1367
  • [7] Does shared decision making exist in oncologic practice?
    Glimelius, Bengt
    Cavalli-Bjorkman, Nina
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2016, 55 (02) : 125 - 128
  • [8] Shared decision-making is not common in clinical practice
    Schoon, Yvonne
    [J]. HEART, 2022, 108 (07) : 498 - 499
  • [9] Learning shared decision-making in clinical practice
    Oerlemans, Anke J. M.
    Knippenberg, Marjan L.
    Olthuis, Gert J.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (05) : 1206 - 1212
  • [10] Mutual influence in shared decision making: a collaborative study of patients and physicians
    Lown, Beth A.
    Hanson, Janice L.
    Clark, William D.
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2009, 12 (02) : 160 - 174