Citalopram for major depressive disorder in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published placebo-controlled trials

被引:11
|
作者
Apler, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2011年 / 1卷 / 02期
关键词
MONTGOMERY-ASBERG DEPRESSION; DOUBLE-BLIND; RATING-SCALE; PARKINSONS-DISEASE; 40; MG; ANTIDEPRESSANT; EFFICACY; ESCITALOPRAM; MULTICENTER; REMISSION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000106
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of citalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults, in a systematic review of all published, randomised, double-blind studies comparing it with a placebo. Data sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, PsychINFO and Embase. Study selection: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of citalopram in adults with MDD were included. Studies with medically ill or treatment resistant subjects were excluded, as were studies of relapse prevention. Remission of MDD was defined as a primary outcome, and response or change from baseline scores were defined as secondary. Data extraction: Remission, response and symptom improvement scores on the Hamilton Depression Scale, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scales were extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis was carried out on the response rates and symptom improvement scores. Included studies were examined for the presence of bias and small study effects. Results: Eight studies (n=2025) met the inclusion criteria. Two studies provided data on remission, but only one of these showed a significant difference between citalopram and placebo (RR=1.59, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.31). Meta-analysis of response rates in five studies (n=1010) revealed significant superiority of citalopram (RR=1.42, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.73). Meta-analysis of change from baseline scores in five studies (n=1541) gave a standardised mean difference (Hedges' g) of -0.27 (95% CI -0.38 to to -0.16), showing a reduction in MDD symptoms to be significant for citalopram relative to placebo. There was no evidence of any significant small study effects. The overall quality of reporting was poor, with insufficient information on the methodology or outcomes. Seven studies received industry sponsorship. Conclusions: Data concerning remission rates for citalopram, relative to placebo, are inconclusive. Response rates and symptom reduction scores in citalopram-treated patients with MDD are significantly better relative to placebo treatment, according to a meta-analysis of published reports. Evaluation of unpublished data is necessary to assess more definitively the effectiveness of citalopram for MDD.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials of vortioxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults
    Thase, Michael E.
    Mahableshwarkar, Atul R.
    Dragheim, Marianne
    Loft, Henrik
    Vieta, Eduard
    [J]. EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 26 (06) : 979 - 993
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of riluzole for depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials
    Yao, Ruzhan
    Wang, Haiquan
    Yuan, Mingqi
    Wang, Guanglin
    Wu, Chengxi
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2020, 284
  • [3] Atypical Antipsychotic Augmentation in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trials
    Nelson, J. Craig
    Papakostas, George I.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 166 (09): : 980 - 991
  • [4] Statins for major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    De Giorgi, Riccardo
    De Crescenzo, Franco
    Rizzo Pesci, Nicola
    Martens, Marieke
    Howard, Wendy
    Cowen, Philip J.
    Harmer, Catherine J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [5] Placebo-Controlled Trials in Surgery A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Probst, Pascal
    Grummich, Kathrin
    Harnoss, Julian C.
    Huettner, Felix J.
    Jensen, Katrin
    Braun, Silvia
    Kieser, Meinhard
    Ulrich, Alexis
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Diener, Markus K.
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (17)
  • [6] Efficacy Comparison of Escitalopram and Citalopram in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: Pooled Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Trials
    Gorman, Jack M.
    Korotzer, Andrew
    Su, Guojin
    [J]. CNS SPECTRUMS, 2002, 7 (04) : 40 - 44
  • [7] Quetiapine monotherapy in acute phase for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials
    Narong Maneeton
    Benchalak Maneeton
    Manit Srisurapanont
    Stephen D Martin
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 12
  • [8] Quetiapine monotherapy in acute phase for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials
    Maneeton, Narong
    Maneeton, Benchalak
    Srisurapanont, Manit
    Martin, Stephen D.
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 12
  • [9] Vortioxetine vs placebo in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials in Japan
    Kishi, Taro
    Sakuma, Kenji
    Okuya, Makoto
    Matsuda, Yuki
    Iwata, Nakao
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2020, 74 (05) : 330 - 332
  • [10] Vortioxetine versus reuptake inhibitors in adults with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Barbosa, Eduardo Cerchi
    da Silva, Giovanna Hanike Santos
    Sbardelotto, Angelo Eduardo Espindola
    Barroso, Douglas Carneiro
    de Lima, Fernanda Ribeiro
    Paez, Loyna Eua Flores E.
    Lanca, Saulo Bernardo
    Petrucci, Arthur Bezerra Cavalcanti
    Guimaraes, Felipe Bandeira de Melo
    Nascimento, Antonio Leandro
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 101