Hybrid upwind discretization of nonlinear two-phase flow with gravity

被引:33
|
作者
Lee, S. H. [1 ]
Efendiev, Y. [2 ]
Tchelepi, H. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Chevron Energy Technol Co, Houston, TX 77002 USA
[2] Texas A&M, Dept Math, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Energy Resources Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Nonlinear hyperbolic; Discretization; Upwinding; Gravity; Nonlinear solver; Immiscible multiphase flow; POROUS-MEDIA; MULTIPHASE FLOW; CONSERVATION-LAWS; CONVERGENCE; SCHEMES; SOLVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.04.007
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Multiphase flow in porous media is described by coupled nonlinear mass conservation laws. For immiscible Darcy flow of multiple fluid phases, whereby capillary effects are negligible, the transport equations in the presence of viscous and buoyancy forces are highly nonlinear and hyperbolic. Numerical simulation of multiphase flow processes in heterogeneous formations requires the development of discretization and solution schemes that are able to handle the complex nonlinear dynamics, especially of the saturation evolution, in a reliable and computationally efficient manner. In reservoir simulation practice, single-point upwinding of the flux across an interface between two control volumes (cells) is performed for each fluid phase, whereby the upstream direction is based on the gradient of the phase-potential (pressure plus gravity head). This upwinding scheme, which we refer to as Phase-Potential Upwinding (PPU), is combined with implicit (backward-Euler) time discretization to obtain a Fully Implicit Method (FIM). Even though FIM suffers from numerical dispersion effects, it is widely used in practice. This is because of its unconditional stability and because it yields conservative, monotone numerical solutions. However, FIM is not unconditionally convergent. The convergence difficulties are particularly pronounced when the different immiscible fluid phases switch between co-current and counter-current states as a function of time, or (Newton) iteration. Whether the multiphase flow across an interface (between two control-volumes) is co-current, or counter-current, depends on the local balance between the viscous and buoyancy forces, and how the balance evolves in time. The sensitivity of PPU to small changes in the (local) pressure distribution exacerbates the problem. The common strategy to deal with these difficulties is to cut the timestep and try again. Here, we propose a Hybrid-Upwinding (HU) scheme for the phase fluxes, then HU is combined with implicit time discretization to yield a fully implicit method. In the HU scheme, the phase flux is divided into two parts based on the driving force. The viscous-driven and buoyancy-driven phase fluxes are upwinded differently. Specifically, the viscous flux, which is always co-current, is upwinded based on the direction of the total-velocity. The buoyancy-driven flux across an interface is always counter-current and is upwinded such that the heavier fluid goes downward and the lighter fluid goes upward. We analyze the properties of the Implicit Hybrid Upwinding (IHU) scheme. It is shown that IHU is locally conservative and produces monotone, physically-consistent numerical solutions. The IHU solutions show numerical diffusion levels that are slightly higher than those for standard FIM (i.e., implicit PPU). The primary advantage of the IHU scheme is that the numerical overall-flux of a fluid phase remains continuous and differentiable as the flow regime changes between co-current and counter-current conditions. This is in contrast to the standard phase-potential upwinding scheme, in which the overall fractional-flow (flux) function is non-differentiable across the boundary between co-current and counter-current flows. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 38
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A hybrid upwind scheme for two-phase flow in fractured porous media
    Ballini, Enrico
    Formaggia, Luca
    Fumagalli, Alessio
    Keilegavlen, Eirik
    Scotti, Anna
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 432
  • [2] Central Upwind Scheme for a Compressible Two-Phase Flow Model
    Ahmed, Munshoor
    Saleem, M. Rehan
    Zia, Saqib
    Qamar, Shamsul
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [3] An upwind numerical method for two-fluid two-phase flow models
    Toumi, I
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 1996, 123 (02) : 147 - 168
  • [4] High-order upwind schemes for two-phase, multicomponent flow
    Mallison, BT
    Gerritsen, MG
    Jessen, K
    Orr, FM
    SPE JOURNAL, 2005, 10 (03): : 297 - 311
  • [5] Fitted finite element discretization of two-phase Stokes flow
    Agnese, Marco
    Nurnberg, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2016, 82 (11) : 709 - 729
  • [6] Hybrid central-upwind schemes for numerical resolution of two-phase flows
    Evje, S
    Flåtten, T
    ESAIM-MATHEMATICAL MODELLING AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS-MODELISATION MATHEMATIQUE ET ANALYSE NUMERIQUE, 2005, 39 (02): : 253 - 273
  • [7] Comparison of Gravity Independence Criteria for Two-Phase Flow
    Brendel, Leon P. M.
    Braun, James E.
    Groll, Eckhard A.
    JOURNAL OF THERMOPHYSICS AND HEAT TRANSFER, 2021, 35 (04) : 830 - 842
  • [8] A central-upwind scheme for two-phase shallow granular flow model
    Nabwey, Hossam A.
    Mehmood, Shahid
    Zia, Saqib
    Rehman, Asad
    Ashraf, Muhammad
    Rashad, A. M.
    ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 82 : 291 - 297
  • [9] A Hybrid Method for Two-Phase Flow Simulations
    Dorogan, Kateryna
    Herard, Jean-Marc
    Minier, Jean-Pierre
    COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS 2010, 2011, : 91 - 98
  • [10] An A Posteriori Error Estimator for a Finite Volume Discretization of the Two-phase Flow
    Di Pietro, Daniele A.
    Vohralik, Martin
    Widmer, Carole
    FINITE VOLUMES FOR COMPLEX APPLICATIONS VI: PROBLEMS & PERSPECTIVES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2011, 4 : 341 - +