Comparison of three methods for estimating defoliation in soybean breeding programs

被引:4
|
作者
Bowers, GR
Kenty, MM
Way, MO
Funderburk, JE
Strayer, JR
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Beaumont, TX 77713 USA
[2] Amer Cyanamid Co, Collierville, TN 38017 USA
[3] Univ Florida, N Florida Res & Educ Ctr, Quincy, FL 32351 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Entomol & Nematol, Gainesville, FL 32565 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1999.00021962009100020011x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The proper assessment of defoliation by phytophagous insects in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is required when screening germplasm for insect resistance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and relative efficiency of the widely used visual or relative assessment of insect defoliation compared with a more quantitative assessment for use in soybean breeding programs, In 1985 and 1991, visual assessments (whole plot, 1985; whole plant and average of partitioned plant, 1991) were compared with an established quantitative assessment. Twenty leaflets were randomly removed from each of the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the canopy of each plot. These leaflets mere compared with a template of known defoliation in 1985, In 1991, a leaf area meter was used to determine the actual amount of defoliation of each plant, In 1990 and 1991, two types of visual estimates (whole plant and average of partitioned plant) were also compared with each other. Sampling time was estimated for each method. Estimates between visual and quantitative assessments were highly correlated each year. Precision was similar for each method, Sampling time for the visual assessment was at least 30 times faster than the quantitative assessment. The results of these studies show that relative estimates can be used to assess insect defoliation accurately and quickly.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:242 / 247
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] METHOD OF ESTIMATING INSECT DEFOLIATION OF SOYBEAN
    JENSEN, RL
    NEWSOM, LD
    HERZOG, DC
    THOMAS, JW
    FARTHING, BR
    MARTIN, FA
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1977, 70 (02) : 240 - 242
  • [2] Comparison of three methods for estimating breeding values of Mecheri rams for body weights
    Jeichitra, V.
    Rajendran, R.
    Karunanithi, K.
    Rahumathulla, P. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2015, 49 (02) : 161 - 164
  • [3] COMPARISON OF THE METHODS OF ESTIMATING THE BREEDING VALUE OF COWS
    KLATOVSKY, V
    URBAN, F
    HYANEK, J
    STAVINOHA, P
    ZIVOCISNA VYROBA, 1989, 34 (04): : 333 - 340
  • [4] COMPARISON OF METHODS OF ESTIMATING THE BULL BREEDING VALUE
    PRIBYL, J
    VACHAL, J
    ZIVOCISNA VYROBA, 1979, 24 (07): : 491 - 499
  • [5] Soybean breeding: comparison of the efficiency of different selection methods
    Miladinovic, Jegor
    Burton, Joe W.
    Tubic, Svetlana Balesevic
    Miladinovic, Dragana
    Djordjevic, Vuk
    Djukic, Vojin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2011, 35 (05) : 469 - 480
  • [6] Comparison of Methods for Estimating Soybean Leaf Area Index
    Yang Fei
    Zhang Bai
    Song Kai-shan
    Wang Zong-ming
    Liu Dian-wei
    Liu Huan-jun
    Li Fang
    Li Feng-xu
    Guo Zhi-xing
    Jin Hua-an
    SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2008, 28 (12) : 2951 - 2955
  • [7] Estimating the prevalence of anaemia: a comparison of three methods
    Sari, M
    de Pee, S
    Martini, E
    Herman, S
    Sugiatmi
    Bloem, MW
    Yip, R
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2001, 79 (06) : 506 - 511
  • [8] Hybrid soybean seed production: Comparison of three methods
    Lewers, KS
    StMartin, SK
    Hedges, BR
    Widrlechner, MP
    Palmer, RG
    CROP SCIENCE, 1996, 36 (06) : 1560 - 1567
  • [9] Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating Complete Life Tables
    Ibrahim, Rose Irnawaty
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES (SKSM20): RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES: A CATALYST FOR CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION, PTS A AND B, 2013, 1522 : 1092 - 1097
  • [10] A comparison of methods for estimating raccoon abundance: Implications for disease vaccination programs
    Beasley, James C.
    Beatty, William S.
    Atwood, Todd C.
    Johnson, Shylo R.
    Rhodes, Olin E., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 76 (06): : 1290 - 1297