Impact of Small-Scale Geothermal Power Plant Replenishment with A Life Cycle Assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Tampubolon, Aron Pangihutan Christian [1 ]
Hadiyanto, Hadiyanto [1 ]
Kusdiyantini, Endang [1 ]
机构
[1] Diponegoro Univ, Postgrad Sch, Master Energy, Semarang, Indonesia
来源
关键词
Acidification; Environmental impact; Geothermal; LCA; NCG; EMISSIONS; CO2;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is life cycle thinking replenishment in which the targets are environmental aspects and impacts generated in one product life cycle. The benefits of LCA can be taken into consideration in several choices of system, for example, the comparison of the Small-scale geothermal power plant (Unit-SS) replenishment to Unit-1. LCA results in the form of the impact of the production process per product is 1 kWh electricity. The biggest impact on Unit-1 and Unit-SS is acidification. Acidification comes from the release of NCG into the air from the cooling tower. The acidification impact of Unit-1 result is 0.018139 kg SO2eq/kWh. Furthermore, normalizing impact result shows that the acidification impact is much greater than the impact of global warming, toxicity, and other impacts. The contribution impact of the addition of small-scale when compared to the impact of Unit-1 operations has a positive impact or tends to have a lower environmental impact. The Unit-SS has the potential for acidification of 0.002407 kg SO2eq/kWh lower than Unit-1. In addition, the Unit-SS has more efficient steam consumption by design than Unit-1. Therefore, less impact of Unit-SS can be suspected relate with steam consumption. Another alternative suggestion based on the analysis is an opportunity for further research on the efficiency of the gas removal system which has a positive impact on the distribution of NCG.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 658
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Experimental study and Life Cycle Assessment of biomass small-scale trigeneration plant
    Petrillo, Antonella
    Travaglioni, Marta
    Di Fraia, Simona
    Vanoli, Laura
    Cirillo, Domenico
    La Villetta, Maurizio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 326
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of the Theistareykir geothermal power plant in Iceland
    Kjeld, Alexandra
    Bjarnadottir, Helga Johanna
    Olafsdottir, Ragnheidur
    [J]. GEOTHERMICS, 2022, 105
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of the Theistareykir geothermal power plant in Iceland
    Kjeld, Alexandra
    Bjarnadottir, Helga Johanna
    Olafsdottir, Ragnheiður
    [J]. Geothermics, 2022, 105
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of a small-scale anaerobic digestion plant from cattle waste
    Mezzullo, William G.
    McManus, Marcelle C.
    Hammond, Geoff P.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 102 : 657 - 664
  • [5] GEOTHERMAL ENERGY FOR SMALL-SCALE POWER GENERATION USING AN ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE
    Hessami, Mir Akbar
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY - 2012, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 837 - 846
  • [6] Small-scale geothermal power enters service in Austria
    不详
    [J]. POWER, 2001, 145 (06) : 12 - 12
  • [7] Detailed transient assessment of a small-scale concentrated solar power plant based on the organic Rankine cycle
    Marinheiro, Mauricio Mani
    Coraca, Gustavo Moraes
    Cabezas-Gomez, Luben
    Ribatski, Gherhardt
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 204
  • [8] Biomass from agriculture in small-scale combined heat and power plants - A comparative life cycle assessment
    Kimming, M.
    Sundberg, C.
    Nordberg, A.
    Baky, A.
    Bernesson, S.
    Noren, O.
    Hansson, P-A.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (04): : 1572 - 1581
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of ecological sanitation system for small-scale wastewater treatment
    Benetto, Enrico
    Nguyen, Diep
    Lohmann, Torben
    Schmitt, Bianca
    Schosseler, Paul
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 407 (05) : 1506 - 1516
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of small-scale horizontal axis wind turbines in Taiwan
    Wang, Wei-Cheng
    Teah, Heng-Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 141 : 492 - 501