Cancer patients' views and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative study

被引:15
|
作者
Bartley, Nicci [1 ]
Best, Megan [1 ]
Jacobs, Chris [2 ]
Juraskova, Ilona [1 ]
Newson, Ainsley J. [3 ]
Savard, Jacqueline [4 ]
Meiser, Bettina [5 ]
Ballinger, Mandy L. [6 ,7 ]
Thomas, David M. [6 ,7 ]
Biesecker, Barbara [8 ]
Butow, Phyllis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Fac Sci, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Grad Sch Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Deakin Univ, Sch Med, Fac Hlth, Burwood, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ New South Wales Sydney, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Kinghorn Canc Ctr, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
[7] Garvan Inst Med Res, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
[8] Res Triangle Inst, POB 12194, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cancer; genome sequencing; patient attitudes; psychosocial; qualitative; INFORMED-CONSENT; CLINICAL EXOME; BREAST; GENETICS; MOTIVATIONS; RISK; RECOMMENDATIONS; INFORMATION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106410
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background Little is known about knowledge of, and attitudes towards, genome sequencing (GS) among individuals with a personal history of cancer who decide to undergo GS. This qualitative study aimed to investigate baseline knowledge and attitudes among individuals previously diagnosed with a cancer of likely genetic origin who have consented to GS. Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted with purposively selected participants (n=20) from the longitudinal Psychosocial Issues in Genomic Oncology study, within a month of consenting to GS and prior to receiving any results. Participants were adults with a cancer of likely genetic aetiology who are undertaking GS as part of a larger genetic study. Results Analysis identified three main themes: limited understanding of genomics; multifactorial motivation; and complex decision making. While motivations such as obtaining health information about self and family appear to be the main drivers for undertaking GS, these motivations are sometimes based on limited knowledge of the accuracy and utility of GS, creating unrealistic expectations. This in turn can prolong the deliberation process and lead to ongoing decisional conflict. Conclusion Understanding the degree and nature of patient understanding of GS, as well as their attitudes and decision-making processes, will enable healthcare professionals to better manage patient expectations and appropriately engage and support patients to make an informed decision when pursuing GS.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 676
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Parents' motivations, concerns and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative interview study
    Lewis, Celine
    Sanderson, Saskia
    Hill, Melissa
    Patch, Chris
    Searle, Beverly
    Hunter, Amy
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2020, 28 (07) : 874 - 884
  • [2] Parents’ motivations, concerns and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative interview study
    Celine Lewis
    Saskia Sanderson
    Melissa Hill
    Chris Patch
    Beverly Searle
    Amy Hunter
    Lyn S. Chitty
    [J]. European Journal of Human Genetics, 2020, 28 : 874 - 884
  • [3] ADVANCED CANCER PATIENTS' AND STAKEHOLDERS' ATTITUDES TOWARD CANCER GENOME SEQUENCING TO GUIDE TREATMENT: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Bouchard, Laura C.
    Penedo, Frank
    Shivaprakash, Namrata
    Cella, David
    Cameron, Kenzie
    Cristofanilli, Massimo
    Yanez, Betina
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2018, 52 : S398 - S398
  • [4] Views of children and young adults about Whole Genome Sequencing in newborn screening: a qualitative study
    Parfett, Molly
    Johnson, Faye
    Bennett, Rebecca
    Ulph, Fiona
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, : 1159 - 1165
  • [5] Young cancer patient perspectives on undertaking whole genome sequencing: A qualitative study
    Best, Megan
    Bartley, Nicole
    Jacobs, Chris
    Juraskova, Ilona
    Newson, Ainsley
    Savard, Jacqueline
    Meiser, Bettina
    Ballinger, Mandy
    Thomas, David
    Biesecker, Barbara
    Butow, Phyllis
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 14 : 144 - 144
  • [6] Views of rare disease participants in a UK whole-genome sequencing study towards secondary findings: a qualitative study
    Mackley, Michael P.
    Blair, Edward
    Parker, Michael
    Taylor, Jenny C.
    Watkins, Hugh
    Ormondroyd, Elizabeth
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 26 (05) : 652 - 659
  • [7] Views of rare disease participants in a UK whole-genome sequencing study towards secondary findings: a qualitative study
    Michael P Mackley
    Edward Blair
    Michael Parker
    Jenny C Taylor
    Hugh Watkins
    Elizabeth Ormondroyd
    [J]. European Journal of Human Genetics, 2018, 26 : 652 - 659
  • [8] The views of patients with brain cancer about palliative care: a qualitative study
    Vierhout, M.
    Daniels, M.
    Mazzotta, P.
    Vlahos, J.
    Mason, W. P.
    Bernstein, M.
    [J]. CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (06) : 374 - 382
  • [9] Understanding referral of patients with cancer in rural Ethiopia: a qualitative study
    Trabitzsch, Josephin
    Marquardt, Morena
    Negash, Sarah
    Belay, Winini
    Abebe, Yonas
    Seife, Edom
    Abdella, Kunuz
    Gizaw, Muluken
    Getachew, Sefonias
    Addissie, Adamu
    Kantelhardt, Eva Johanna
    Wondimagegnehu, Abigiya
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [10] CANCER SURVIVORS' VIEWS ON DIET AND CANCER: A QUALITATIVE STUDY
    Williams, Kate
    Beeken, Rebecca J.
    Wardle, Jane
    Croker, Helen
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 10 : 257 - 258