Nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, CLIN-AEROMORPH

被引:0
|
作者
Lvovschi, Virginie Eve [1 ,4 ]
Joly, Justine [1 ]
Lemaire, Nicolas [1 ]
Maignan, Maxime [2 ]
Canavaggio, Pauline [3 ]
Leroi, Anne-Marie [4 ]
Tavolacci, Marie-Pierre [4 ]
Joly, Luc-Marie [1 ]
机构
[1] Rouen Univ Hosp, Emergency Dept, F-76031 Rouen, France
[2] Grenoble Alps Univ, Univ Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Univ Hosp, CHU Grenoble Alpes,Emergency Dept,HP2,INSERM, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[3] Pitie Salpetriere Univ Hosp, AP HP, Emergency Dept, Paris, France
[4] Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, INSERM, U1073, Rouen, France
关键词
Morphine; Pain; Analgesia; Nebulized; Randomised controlled trial; Single blind; PHARMACOKINETICS; MORPHINE-6-GLUCURONIDE; FENTANYL; BIOAVAILABILITY; ABSORPTION; ANALGESIA; SEDATION; AEROSOL; DYSPNEA;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-019-3326-3
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Intravenous morphine titration (IVMT) is the French gold standard for opioid treatment in the emergency department (ED). Nebulized morphine titration (NMT) may represent an alternative without venous access, but it has not been adequately studied in adults. We test the hypothesis that NMT is at least as effective as IVMT to initially manage severe acute pain in the ED. Methods/design: We designed a multicenter (10 French EDs), single-blind, randomized and controlled trial. Adults between 18 and 75 years with visual analog scale (VAS) >= 70/100 or numeric rating scale (NRS) >= 7/10 will be enrolled. We will randomize 850 patients into two groups to compare two routes of MT as long as VAS > 30 or NRS > 3. In group A (425), patients will receive an initial NMT for 5-25 min associated with titration of an intravenously (IV) administered placebo of physiologic serum (PS). In group B (425), patients will receive IVMT plus nebulized PS placebo. NMT is defined as a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 3 5-min nebulized boluses of 10 mg or 15 mg (weight >= 60 kg), at 10-min fixed intervals. IVMT is defined as a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 6 boluses of 2 mg or 3 mg (weight >= 60 kg), at 5-min fixed intervals. Nebulized placebo titration will be performed every 10 min. IV titration of PS will be performed every 5 min. In both groups, after 25 min, if VAS > 30/100 or NRS > 3/10, routine IVMT will be continued until pain relief. Pain severity, vital signs, bronchospasm, and Ramsay score will be recorded every 5 min. The primary outcome is the rate of relief obtained 1 h from the start of drug administration. Complete pain relief in both groups will be compared with a non-inferiority design. Secondary outcomes are pain relief at 30 min (the end of NMT) and at 2 h and median pain relief. We will compare final doses, and study the feasibility and tolerance of NMT (protocol deviations, respiratory or hemodynamic depression, sedation, and minor vegetative side effects). Co-analgesia will be recorded. Discharge criteria from the ED and hospital are defined. Discussion: This trial is the first multicenter randomized and controlled NMT protocol for severe pain in the ED using the titration concept. We propose an original approach of combined titration with an endpoint at 1 h and a non-inferiority design.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, CLIN-AEROMORPH
    Virginie Eve Lvovschi
    Justine Joly
    Nicolas Lemaire
    Maxime Maignan
    Pauline Canavaggio
    Anne-Marie Leroi
    Marie-Pierre Tavolacci
    Luc-Marie Joly
    [J]. Trials, 20
  • [2] Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravenous Acetaminophen Versus Intravenous Hydromorphone for the Treatment of Acute Pain in the Emergency Department
    Barnaby, Douglas P.
    Chertoff, Andrew E.
    Restivo, Andrew J.
    Campbell, Caron M.
    Pearlman, Scott
    White, Deborah
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Gallagher, E. John
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 73 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [3] Nebulized fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in children with suspected limb fractures in the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial
    Furyk, Jeremy S.
    Grabowski, Walter J.
    Black, Lisa H.
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE AUSTRALASIA, 2009, 21 (03) : 203 - 209
  • [4] INTRANASAL SUFENTANIL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE FOR ACUTE PAIN IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: A RANDOMIZED PILOT TRIAL
    Sin, Billy
    Jeffrey, Iain
    Halpern, Zachary
    Adebayo, Adebanke
    Wing, Tom
    Lee, Amy S.
    Ruiz, Josel
    Persaud, Kevin
    Davenport, Lilia
    de Souza, Sylvie
    Williams, Mollie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 56 (03): : 301 - 307
  • [5] Intravenous subdissociative-dose ketamine versus morphine for acute geriatric pain in the Emergency Department: A randomized controlled trial
    Motov, Sergey
    Mann, Stefan
    Drapkin, Jefferson
    Butt, Mahlaqa
    Likourezos, Antonios
    Yetter, Elizabeth
    Brady, Jason
    Rothberger, Nechama
    Gohel, Ankit
    Flom, Peter
    Mai, Mo
    Fromm, Christian
    Marshall, John
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 37 (02): : 220 - 227
  • [6] A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing nebulized ketamine to intravenous morphine for older adults in the emergency department with acute musculoskeletal pain
    Kampan, Sirasa
    Thong-On, Kwannapa
    Sri-On, Jiraporn
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2024, 53 (01)
  • [7] Intravenous acetaminophen with morphine versus intravenous morphine alone for acute pain in the emergency room: protocol for a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study (ADAMOPA)
    Guillaume Cattin
    Joel Jenvrin
    Jean Benoit Hardouin
    Céline Longo
    Emmanuel Montassier
    [J]. Trials, 23
  • [8] Intravenous acetaminophen with morphine versus intravenous morphine alone for acute pain in the emergency room: protocol for a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study (ADAMOPA)
    Cattin, Guillaume
    Jenvrin, Joel
    Hardouin, Jean Benoit
    Longo, Celine
    Montassier, Emmanuel
    [J]. TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [9] Randomized Clinical Trial of an Intravenous Hydromorphone Titration Protocol versus Usual Care for Management of Acute Pain in Older Emergency Department Patients
    Chang, Andrew K.
    Bijur, Polly E.
    Davitt, Michelle
    Gallagher, E. John
    [J]. DRUGS & AGING, 2013, 30 (09) : 747 - 754
  • [10] Randomized Clinical Trial of an Intravenous Hydromorphone Titration Protocol versus Usual Care for Management of Acute Pain in Older Emergency Department Patients
    Andrew K. Chang
    Polly E. Bijur
    Michelle Davitt
    E. John Gallagher
    [J]. Drugs & Aging, 2013, 30 : 747 - 754