Construction Cost of Green Building Certified Residence: A Case Study in Taiwan

被引:23
|
作者
Sun, Chen-Yi [1 ]
Chen, Yin-Guang [1 ]
Wang, Rong-Jing [2 ]
Lo, Shih-Chi [2 ]
Yau, Jyh-Tyng [2 ]
Wu, Ya-Wen [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chengchi Univ, Dept Land Econ, Taipei 11605, Taiwan
[2] Minist Interior, Architecture & Bldg Res Inst, New Taipei 23143, Taiwan
[3] Land Bank Taiwan, Dept Elect Banking, Taipei 10047, Taiwan
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 08期
关键词
policy; sustainable development; environmental friendly; evaluation system; EVALUATION SYSTEM; OFFICE BUILDINGS; BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; ENERGY; ENVIRONMENT; POLICY; MARKET; CHINA; ROOF;
D O I
10.3390/su11082195
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The green building certification system of Taiwan, EEWH (Ecology, Energy Saving, Waste Reduction and Health), has been in operation for more than 20 years (since 1999). In order to understand the relationship between green building certification and the construction costs of residential buildings, this study obtained 37 green building-certified residential cases and 36 general residential cases available from public information and conducted a comparative analysis. The results of this study showed that the average construction cost of a green building certification residential building was only 1.58% higher than a general residential building, indicating that green building certification does not require a large increase in costs. However, for residential buildings, achieving a high-grade (gold-grade or diamond-grade) green building certification means an increase of 6.7% to 9.3% in construction costs. This shows that the pursuit of higher levels of green building certification does require higher construction costs. In addition, the results of this study can not only provide important references for the government in making green building policies, but also offer a practical strategy for developers for decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] From existing conventional building towards LEED certified green building: case study in Bangladesh
    Iqbal, Ashik
    Jahan, Ismat
    Al Wasiew, Qudrati
    Emu, Imtiaz Ahmed
    Chowdhury, Dipta
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 9
  • [2] Analysis of Incremental Cost of Green Residence Building in Cold Regions
    Wang Wenfei
    Charl, E. Janeke
    Wang Na
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CONSTRUCTION ECONOMY AND MANAGEMENT (ISCEM2010), 2010, : 33 - 36
  • [3] Green Building Construction Cost Surcharge: An Overview
    Hu, Ming
    Skibniewski, Miroslaw
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 27 (04)
  • [4] Implementation of certified intelligent building in Taiwan
    Hsiao, Jung Shu
    Chen, Julie Chia-Ping
    Tsaih, Lucky Shin-Jyun
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MATERIALS SCIENCE (ICCEMS 2019), 2019, 652
  • [5] The Researches on the Green Construction Model of the Steel Building System of Residence Project
    Chen Wei
    Duan Lijie
    Cai Yuchun
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3, 2011, 52-54 : 773 - 776
  • [6] Analyzing the effects of green building on housing prices: case study of Kaohsiung, Taiwan
    Ming-Yi Huang
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 1205 - 1235
  • [7] Analyzing the effects of green building on housing prices: case study of Kaohsiung, Taiwan
    Huang, Ming-Yi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (02) : 1205 - 1235
  • [8] Green Building Construction Projects in Singapore: Cost Premiums and Cost Performance
    Hwang, Bon-Gang
    Zhu, Lei
    Wang, Yinglin
    Cheong, Xinyi
    [J]. PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 48 (04) : 67 - 79
  • [9] Pivotal stimulants to halal certified firms: a case study of Taiwan
    Amalia, Fatya Alty
    Lestari, Yuliani Dwi
    Wang, Kung-Jeng
    Saidah, Faridatus
    Putri, Aghnia Nadhira Aliya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC MARKETING, 2023, 14 (12) : 3133 - 3149
  • [10] A Case Study on Building the Certified Angus Beef® Brand
    Siebert, John W.
    Jones, Clay
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 16 (03): : 195 - 208