共 50 条
Referral pathways in colorectal cancer: an audit of surgeons records
被引:2
|作者:
Spigelman, Allan D.
[1
]
Pascoe, Shane W.
[2
]
Harris, Mark F.
[2
]
Beilby, Justin J.
[3
]
Crossland, Lisa J.
[4
]
Gett, Rohan M.
[1
]
Barton, Michael B.
[5
]
Jayasinghe, Upali W.
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ New S Wales, St Vincents Clin Sch, Canc Serv, St Vincents & Mater Hlth Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Res Ctr Primary Hlth Care & Equ, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Discipline Gen Practice, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] James Cook Univ, Dept Rural Hlth, Mt Isa Ctr Rural & Remote Hlth, Mt Isa, Qld 4825, Australia
[5] Liverpool Hlth Serv, Collaborat Canc Outcomes Res & Evaluat, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
关键词:
D O I:
10.1071/AH13038
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Purpose. To explore the referral pathways of patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer to surgeons. Method. Australian surgeons from three states completed a questionnaire and their records were audited. Results. Thirty-three surgeons provided data on 530 patients seen in the preceding 12 months. The median time between colonoscopy and first surgical consult was 10 days, with 19% of patients waiting more than 28 days. After adjustment for clustering, no surgeon factors were associated with the number of days between colonoscopy and surgery. A report back to the general practitioner (GP) was found in 78% of patients' records. This feedback varied between surgeons but none of the specific surgeon characteristics examined could explain this. Conclusion. Surgeons usually communicated with GP regardless of whether they were the referral source. However, communication with GP varied considerably among surgeons, with no evidence of a report to the GP in one-fifth of cases.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 452
页数:4
相关论文