Development and Validation of the Revised Identity Style Inventory (ISI-5): Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity

被引:75
|
作者
Berzonsky, Michael D. [1 ]
Soenens, Bart [2 ]
Luyckx, Koen [3 ]
Smits, Ilse [3 ]
Papini, Dennis R. [4 ]
Goossens, Luc [3 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Cortland, Dept Psychol, Cortland, NY 13045 USA
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Dev Personal & Social Psychol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Sch Psychol & Child & Adolescent Psychol, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Middle Tennessee State Univ, Dept Psychol, Murfreesboro, TN 37130 USA
关键词
identity style; commitment; rational processing; identity formation; psychometric; EGO-IDENTITY; PROCESSING STYLE; PERSPECTIVE; NEED;
D O I
10.1037/a0032642
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Identity processing style refers to differences in how individuals process identity-relevant information as they engage or manage to avoid the challenges of constructing, maintaining, and/or reconstructing a sense of identity. The third version of the Identity Style Inventory (Berzonsky, 1992b) has been used to operationally define identity styles in most empirical investigations. The objective of the present series of studies was the development and validation of a new revised measure of identity processing style: Identity Style Inventory Version 5 (ISI-5). Initially a pool of 39 generic items was generated that highlighted the processing of identity-relevant information on content-neutral issues such as personal values, goals, problems, and the like. Three style scales were identified by Exploratory Factor Analysis: A 9-item Informational-style scale; a 9-item Normative-style scale; and a 9-item Diffuse-avoidant style scale. Confirmatory factor analysis on an independent sample indicated that this 3-factor solution provided the best fit. Results from 5 studies provided evidence for the psychometric properties of the scales. Scores on the 3 style scales demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Theoretically predicted correlations between the ISI-5 scale scores and performance on measures of identity status, content, and commitment, and measures of rational and automatic processing provided evidence for their convergent and discriminant validity. It is concluded that the scales should be useful for researchers interested in investigating individual differences in identity processing style. Limitations and directions for future research are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:893 / 904
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Revised Identity Style Inventory: Factor Structure and Validity in Italian Speaking Students
    Monacis, Lucia
    de Palo, Valeria
    Sinatra, Maria
    Berzonsky, Michael D.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
  • [2] Development of the Inventory of Premarital Commitment (IPC): Factor structure, reliability, and validity
    Utsunomiya, Hiroshi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 730 - 730
  • [3] Further validation of the birth satisfaction scale-revised: Factor structure, validity, and reliability
    Sandra Nakić Radoš
    Marijana Matijaš
    Maja Brekalo
    Caroline J. Hollins Martin
    Colin R. Martin
    [J]. Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 13693 - 13702
  • [4] Further validation of the birth satisfaction scale-revised: Factor structure, validity, and reliability
    Rados, Sandra Nakic
    Matijas, Marijana
    Brekalo, Maja
    Martin, Caroline J. Hollins
    Martin, Colin R.
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (16) : 13693 - 13702
  • [5] Brief report: The Identity Style Inventory (ISI-3) and the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS): Factor structure, reliability, and convergent validity in French-speaking university students
    Zimmermann, Gregoire
    Mahaim, Elodie Biermann
    Mantzouranis, Gregory
    Genoud, Philippe A.
    Crocetti, Elisabetta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2012, 35 (02) : 461 - 465
  • [6] Development and Validation of a Coping With Discrimination Scale: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity
    Wei, Meifen
    Alvarez, Alvin N.
    Ku, Tsun-Yao
    Russell, Daniel W.
    Bonett, Douglas G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 57 (03) : 328 - 344
  • [7] Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the revised Suicide Crisis Inventory in major depression: A multicentric Indian study
    Menon, Vikas
    Balasubramanian, Ilambaridhi
    Rogers, Megan L.
    Grover, Sandeep
    Lakdawala, Bhaveshkumar
    Ranjan, Rajeev
    Sarkhel, Sujit
    Nebhinani, Naresh
    Kallivayalilh, Roy Abraham
    Raghavan, Vijaya
    Mishra, Kshirod Kumar
    Aneja, Jitender
    Abhivant, Niteen
    Deep, Raman
    Singh, Lokesh Kumar
    De Sousa, Avinash
    Nongpiur, Arvind
    Subramanyam, Alka A.
    Mohapatra, Debadatta
    Kar, Sujita Kumar
    Dhiman, Vishal
    Kumar, P. N. Suresh
    Shreekantiah, Umesh
    Bhandari, Samrat Singh
    Ransing, Ramdas
    Ramasubramanian, Vikhram
    Praharaj, Samir Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2024, 345 : 226 - 233
  • [9] Development and validation of the Fitness Coaching Behavior Scale: Factor structure, validity and reliability
    Sampaio, Antonio Rodrigues
    Pimenta, Nuno
    Machado, Mafalda
    Teques, Pedro
    [J]. RETOS-NUEVAS TENDENCIAS EN EDUCACION FISICA DEPORTE Y RECREACION, 2020, (37): : 679 - 685
  • [10] Factor Structure and Validation of the Revised Suicide Crisis Inventory in a Korean Population
    Park, Ji Yoon
    Rogers, Megan L.
    Bloch-Elkouby, Sarah
    Richards, Jenelle A.
    Lee, Sungwoo
    Galynker, Igor
    You, Sungeun
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2023, 20 (02) : 162 - 173