INTUBATION IN PEDIATRIC/NEONATAL CRITICAL CARE TRANSPORT: NATIONAL PERFORMANCE

被引:12
|
作者
Bigelow, Amee M. [1 ]
Gothard, M. David [2 ]
Schwartz, Hamilton P.
Bigham, Michael T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Akron Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Akron, OH USA
[2] Biostats Inc, East Canton, OH USA
[3] Akron Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Div Crit Care Med, Akron, OH USA
关键词
interfacility transport; intubation; critical care transport; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; SUCCESS RATES; CHILDREN; SIMULATION; PARAMEDICS; EMERGENCY;
D O I
10.3109/10903127.2014.980481
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: There are nearly 200,000 US infants/children transported annually for specialty care and there are no published best practices in transport intubation. Objective: Respiratory interventions are a priority in pediatric and neonatal critical care transport (PNCCT). A recent Delphi study identified intubation performance as an important PNCCT quality metric, though data are insufficient. The objective of the study is to determine multi-center rates of first attempt intubation success in pediatric/neonatal transport and identify practice processes associated with higher performing centers. Methods: Retrospective chart review where data was collected from the 9 participating centers over a 6-month period from January June 2013. Data describing intubation training and practices were gathered using SurveyMonkey (R) (Palo Alto, CA). Data were tabulated in Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA) and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Through the determination of 1st intubation success rate across multiple pediatric/neonatal critical care transport programs, we hypothesized that the features of higher and lower performing centers can be identified to inform practice. Results: 9 of 14 invited institutions participated. The median (IQR) 6-month transport volume for neonates(neo) was 289(35-646) and pediatric (ped) 510(122-831). On average, 7%(+/-3.0) of neo and 1.6%(+/-0.7) of ped transport patients required intubation. Individual centers had their initial success rate calculated and a 95% confidence interval was determined for those centers satisfying the np > 5 and n(1-p) > 5 sample size requirement for normality assumption of proportions. Since the overall success rate was 64%, it was determined that n = 14 initial intubation attempts would be the minimum number needed per center in order to fulfill the sample size requirement for normality assumption. Centers whose 95% confidence interval did not contain the initial overall success rate were identified. Conclusion: This represents the first multi-center neo/ped intubation dataset in PNCCT. First attempt intubation success lags behind reported anesthesia intubation rates but parallels pediatric emergency department intubation success rates. Training and operational processes are variable in PNCCT, though top performing teams require live-patient intubation success to achieve initial intubation competency.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 357
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intubation in Pediatric/Neonatal Critical Care Transport: A National Benchmark
    Bigham, Michael
    Bigelow, Amee
    Schwartz, Hamilton
    Gothard, M.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (12)
  • [2] RISK FACTORS FOR FAILED TRACHEAL INTUBATION IN PEDIATRIC AND NEONATAL CRITICAL CARE SPECIALTY TRANSPORT
    Smith, Kristen A.
    Gothard, M. David
    Schwartz, Hamilton P.
    Giuliano, John S., Jr.
    Forbes, Michael
    Bigham, Michael T.
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2015, 19 (01) : 17 - 22
  • [3] The Impact of Videolaryngoscopy on Endotracheal Intubation Success by a Pediatric/Neonatal Critical Care Transport Team
    Abid, Edir S.
    McNamara, Jennifer
    Hall, Pamela
    Miller, Kelsey A.
    Monuteaux, Michael
    Kleinman, Monica E.
    Nagler, Joshua
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2021, 25 (03) : 325 - 332
  • [4] Endotracheal intubation by pediatric critical care transport nurses
    Kleinman, ME
    Ambrose, J
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (12) : A79 - A79
  • [5] Quality Metrics in Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care Transport: A National Delphi Project
    Schwartz, Hamilton P.
    Bigham, Michael T.
    Schoettker, Pamela J.
    Meyer, Keith
    Trautman, Michael S.
    Insoft, Robert M.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (08) : 711 - 717
  • [6] Pediatric and neonatal critical care transport: A Canadian experience
    Barclay, A
    Ouellette, Y
    Noel, D
    Singh, R
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (12) : A171 - A171
  • [7] Tip of the Endotracheal Tube: Reassessment of Intubation Procedure in Pediatric and Neonatal Critical Care
    Dong, Ying
    Sun, Bo
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (11) : 1095 - 1096
  • [8] Pediatric and neonatal critical care transport: A comparison of therapeutic interventions
    Kronick, JB
    Frewen, TC
    Kissoon, N
    Lee, R
    Sommerauer, JF
    Reid, WD
    Casier, S
    Boyle, K
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 1996, 12 (01) : 23 - 26
  • [9] POST-INTUBATION CHEST X-RAY DURING PEDIATRIC/NEONATAL CRITICAL CARE TRANSPORT: IS IT WORTH THE WAIT?
    Garrett, Lynne
    Giuliano, John
    Schwartz, Hamilton
    Bigham, Michael
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (12) : U17 - U17
  • [10] Quality Metrics in Neonatal and Pediatric Critical Care Transport: A Consensus Statement
    Bigham, Michael T.
    Schwartz, Hamilton P.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (05) : 518 - 524