Positional Calibration of an Ultrasound Image-Guided Robotic Breast Biopsy System

被引:14
|
作者
Nelson, Thomas R. [1 ]
Tran, Amy [1 ]
Fakourfar, Hourieh [1 ]
Nebeker, Jakob [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
关键词
breast cancer; biopsy; imaging; robotics; 3-dimensional; ultrasound; volume; NEEDLE PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.7863/jum.2012.31.3.351
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives-Precision biopsy of small lesions is essential in providing high-quality patient diagnosis and management. Localization depends on high-quality imaging. We have developed a dedicated, fully automatic volume breast ultrasound (US) imaging system for early breast cancer detection. This work focuses on development of an image-guided robotic biopsy system that is integrated with the volume breast US system for performing minimally invasive breast biopsies. The objective of this work was to assess the positional accuracy of the robotic system for breast biopsy. Methods-We have adapted a compact robotic arm for performing breast biopsy. The arm incorporates a force torque sensor and is modified to accommodate breast biopsy sampling needles mounted on the robot end effector. Volume breast US images are used as input to a targeting algorithm that provides the physician with control of biopsy device guidance and trajectory optimization. In this work, the positional accuracy was evaluated using (1) alight-emitting diode (LED) mounted on the end effector and (2) a LED mounted on the end of a biopsy needle, each of which was imaged for each robot controller position as part of mapping the positional accuracy throughout a volume that would contain the breast. We measured the error in each location and the cumulative error. Results-Robotic device performance over the volume provided mean accuracy +/- SD of 0.76 +/- 0.13 mm (end effector) and 0.55 +/- 0.13 mm (needle sample location), sufficient for a targeting accuracy within 1 mm, which is suitable for clinical use. Depth positioning error also was small: 0.38 +/- 0.03 mm. Reproducibility was excellent with less than 0.5% variation. Conclusions-Overall accuracy and reproducibility of the compact robotic device were excellent, well within clinical biopsy performance requirements. Volume breast US data I provide high-quality input to a biopsy sampling algorithm under physician control. Robotic devices may provide more precise device placement, assisting physicians with biopsy procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 359
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound image-guided core biopsy of the breast
    Klimberg, V. Suzanne
    Rivere, Amy
    [J]. CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 5 (03)
  • [2] Calibration of Image-Guided Robotic System for Prostate Brachytherapy
    Buzurovic, I.
    Podder, T.
    Hu, Y.
    Yan, K.
    Valicenti, R.
    Dicker, A.
    Yu, Y.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06) : 2970 - +
  • [3] Image-guided breast biopsy
    Edwards, MJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 173 (01): : 12 - 13
  • [4] Image-guided breast biopsy
    King, TA
    Fuhrman, GM
    [J]. SEMINARS IN SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 20 (03): : 197 - 205
  • [5] Image-guided breast biopsy
    Ralleigh, G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF EDINBURGH, 2005, 35 (03): : 219 - 220
  • [6] Stereo-fluoroscopic image-guided robotic biopsy system
    Shi, MY
    Liu, H
    Tao, G
    Fajardo, LL
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC, GUIDANCE, AND SURGICAL-ASSIST SYSTEMS, 1999, 3595 : 193 - 200
  • [7] Image-guided robotic interventions for breast biopsy and ablative therapies: challenges and opportunities
    Desai, Jaydev P.
    Gullapalli, Rao
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH, 2009, 5 (03) : 229 - 233
  • [8] Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy
    Liberman, L
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 40 (03) : 483 - +
  • [9] 15. Image-guided breast biopsy
    Ralleigh, G
    Michell, MJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2002, 56 (08) : 583 - 587
  • [10] Image-Guided Breast Interventions: Biopsy and Beyond
    Dhamija, Ekta
    Singh, Rashmi
    Mishra, Seema
    Hari, Smriti
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2021, 31 (02): : 391 - 399