INVERSE UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION OF A CELL MODEL USING A GAUSSIAN PROCESS METAMODEL

被引:3
|
作者
de Vries, Kevin [1 ]
Nikishova, Anna [1 ]
Czaja, Benjamin [1 ]
Zavodszky, Gabor [1 ]
Hoekstra, Alfons G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Computat Sci Lab, Inst Informat, Fac Sci, NL-1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
inverse uncertainty quantification; Bayesian annealed sequential importance sampling; HemoCell; emulator; Markov chain Monte Carlo; DEFORMABILITY; SENSITIVITY; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2020033186
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In order to accurately describe the mechanics of red blood cells (RBCs) and resulting fluid dynamics, a cell-resolved blood flow fluid solver is required. The parameters of the material model for the RBC membranes are carefully tuned to reproduce the behavior of real cells under various experimental conditions. In this work, uncertainty in the parameters of the material model for RBCs used in a model for RBC suspensions was estimated with Inverse Uncertainty Quantification (IUQ) using Bayesian Annealed Sequential Importance Sampling (BASIS). Due to the relatively high computational cost of the model, a Gaussian Process regression metamodel was trained in order to feasibly draw the large number of samples required to obtain an accurate posterior distribution estimate. Additionally, the identifiability of the model parameters was estimated using Sobol sensitivity indices. The elongation index of simulated RBCs in a perfect sheared environment was the model prediction used to calibrate model parameters. The results show good identifiability of the parameter defining the tensile properties of the cell membrane and viscosity ratio, and poor identifiability of the parameter defining the response of the cell surface while undergoing bending. This suggests that the latter should be identified using a different quantity of interest. Overall, the model outputs with the optimal values of the parameters obtained using the Gaussian Process metamodel match better or close to the measurements than the results with the parameters' values obtained with the original model. Therefore, we can conclude that it is a valid method to decrease the computational cost of IUQ of the model.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 349
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analytical uncertainty quantification for modal frequencies with structural parameter uncertainty using a Gaussian process metamodel
    Wan, Hua-Ping
    Mao, Zhu
    Todd, Michael D.
    Ren, Wei-Xin
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 75 : 577 - 589
  • [2] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION OF RELIABILITY ANALYSIS UNDER SURROGATE MODEL UNCERTAINTY USING GAUSSIAN PROCESS
    Bae, Sangjune
    Park, Chanyoung
    Kim, Nam H.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 2B, 2018,
  • [3] Choosing a Metamodel of a Simulation Model for Uncertainty Quantification
    de Carvalho, Tiago M.
    van Rosmalen, Joost
    Wolff, Harold B.
    Koffijberg, Hendrik
    Coupe, Veerle M. H.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2022, 42 (01) : 28 - 42
  • [4] METAMODEL UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION BY USING BAYES' THEOREM
    Xiao, Mi
    Yao, Qiangzhuang
    Gao, Liang
    Xiong, Haihong
    Wang, Fengxiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2015, VOL 2B, 2016,
  • [5] Inverse uncertainty quantification using the modular Bayesian approach based on Gaussian process, Part 1: Theory
    Wu, Xu
    Kozlowski, Tomasz
    Meidani, Hadi
    Shirvan, Koroush
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2018, 335 : 339 - 355
  • [6] Gaussian Process-Based Inverse Uncertainty Quantification for TRACE Physical Model Parameters Using Steady-State PSBT Benchmark
    Wang, Chen
    Wu, Xu
    Kozlowski, Tomasz
    [J]. NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 193 (1-2) : 100 - 114
  • [7] STATISTICAL GUARANTEES FOR BAYESIAN UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION IN NONLINEAR INVERSE PROBLEMS WITH GAUSSIAN PROCESS PRIORS
    Monard, Francois
    Nickl, Richard
    Paternain, Gabriel P.
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2021, 49 (06): : 3255 - 3298
  • [8] Inverse uncertainty quantification using the modular Bayesian approach based on Gaussian Process, Part 2: Application to TRACE
    Wu, Xu
    Kozlowski, Tomasz
    Meidani, Hadi
    Shirvan, Koroush
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2018, 335 : 417 - 431
  • [9] Uncertainty Quantification in Stochastic Economic Dispatch using Gaussian Process Emulation
    Hu, Zhixiong
    Xu, Yijun
    Korkali, Mert
    Chen, Xiao
    Mili, Lamine
    Tong, Charles H.
    [J]. 2020 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE (ISGT), 2020,
  • [10] Radiation image reconstruction and uncertainty quantification using a Gaussian process prior
    Lee, Jaewon
    Joshi, Tenzing H.
    Bandstra, Mark S.
    Gunter, Donald L.
    Quiter, Brian J.
    Cooper, Reynold J.
    Vetter, Kai
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):