Cost of Neuromodulation Therapies for Overactive Bladder: Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Versus Sacral Nerve Stimulation

被引:36
|
作者
Martinson, Melissa [1 ]
MacDiarmid, Scott [3 ]
Black, Edward [2 ]
机构
[1] Techn Res LLC, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Reimbursement Strategies LLC, St Paul, MN USA
[3] Alliance Urol Specialists, Greensboro, NC USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2013年 / 189卷 / 01期
关键词
urinary bladder; overactive; urinary incontinence; transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation; implantable neurostimulators; costs and cost analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.085
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Conservative therapy and antimuscarinic agents are first line therapies for overactive bladder. Patients refractory to treatment are candidates for neuromodulation therapy. We estimated the costs and cost-effectiveness of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and sacral nerve stimulation. Materials and Methods: A Markov model was constructed to simulate the total costs and effectiveness of percutaneous tibial and sacral nerve stimulation during 2 years. Cost data used average Medicare national physician payments, and ambulatory payment classification and diagnosis related group payments for hospital based care and office visits. Clinical effectiveness, and the rates of patient adherence to treatment and adverse events were estimated by a review of the literature. Results: The costs of initial therapy were $1,773 for 12 weekly percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation treatments and $1,857 for test sacral nerve stimulation. For ongoing therapy the cost of the sacral nerve stimulation surgical implant was $22,970. Cumulative discounted 2-year costs were $3,850 for percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and $14,160 for sacral nerve stimulation, including those who discontinued therapy. Of the patients 48% and 49%, respectively, remained on therapy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $573,000 per additional patient on sacral nerve stimulation. When considering only patients who completed initial stimulation successfully, the costs were $4,867 and $24,342 for percutaneous tibial and sacral nerve stimulation with 71% and 90%, respectively, remaining on therapy for an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $99,872. Conclusions: Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and sacral nerve stimulation are safe, effective neuromodulation therapies for overactive bladder. In this economic model percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation had substantially lower cost. An additional 1% of patients would remain on therapy at 2 years if sacral nerve stimulation were used rather than percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation but the average cost per additional patient would be more than $500,000.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 216
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Cost of Neuromodulation Therapies for Overactive Bladder: Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation versus Sacral Nerve Stimulation
    Barnett, Gillian
    Ockrim, Jeremy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (04): : 1444 - 1445
  • [2] Re: Cost of Neuromodulation Therapies for Overactive Bladder: Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation versus Sacral Nerve Stimulation Reply
    Martinson, M.
    MacDiarmid, S.
    Black, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (04): : 1445 - 1446
  • [3] Cost of Neuromodulation Therapies for Overactive Bladder: Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation Versus Sacral Nerve Stimulation (vol 189, pg 210, 2013)
    Martinson, Melissa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (03): : 1142 - 1142
  • [4] LONG TERM COST EFFECTIVENESS OF PERCUTANEOUS TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION AND SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER TREATMENT
    MacDiarmid, Scott
    Martinson, Melissa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E136 - E136
  • [5] The management of overactive bladder: percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, sacral nerve stimulation, or botulinum toxin?
    Tubaro, Andrea
    Puccini, Federica
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2015, 25 (04) : 305 - 310
  • [6] Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation and Sacral Neuromodulation: an Update
    Gupta, Priyanka
    Ehlert, Michael J.
    Sirls, Larry T.
    Peters, Kenneth M.
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 16 (02)
  • [7] PERCUTANEOUS TIBIAL NERVE STIMULATION FOR OVERACTIVE BLADDER
    Tudor, Katarina Ivana
    Seth, Jai
    Ochulor, Juliana
    Liechti, Martina D.
    Fox, Zoe
    Gonzales, Gwen
    Haslam, Collette
    Pakzad, Mahreen
    Elneil, Sohier
    Panicker, Jalesh N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 85 (10):
  • [8] Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder
    Rufus Cartwright
    Vik Khullar
    [J]. Nature Reviews Urology, 2010, 7 : 181 - 182
  • [9] Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation and Overactive Bladder
    Kamran P. Sajadi
    Howard B. Goldman
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2010, 11 (5) : 293 - 295
  • [10] Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation and Sacral Neuromodulation: an Update
    Priyanka Gupta
    Michael J. Ehlert
    Larry T. Sirls
    Kenneth M. Peters
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2015, 16