Evaluating the Performance of the SCOPE Model in Simulating Canopy Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence

被引:28
|
作者
Hu, Jiaochan [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xinjie [1 ]
Liu, Liangyun [1 ]
Guan, Linlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Remote Sensing & Digital Earth, Key Lab Digital Earth Sci, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence; fluorescence quantum efficiency in dark-adapted conditions (FQE); SCOPE; Fraunhofer Line Discrimination (FLD); gross primary productivity (GPP); GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTION; LEAF OPTICAL-PROPERTIES; A FLUORESCENCE; PHOTOSYNTHETIC CAPACITY; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; PHOTOSYSTEM-II; QUANTUM YIELD; WINTER-WHEAT; PHOTON YIELD; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3390/rs10020250
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The SCOPE (soil canopy observation of photochemistry and energy fluxes) model has been widely used to interpret solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and investigate the SIF-photosynthesis links at different temporal and spatial scales in recent years. In the SCOPE model, the fluorescence quantum efficiency in dark-adapted conditions (FQE) for Photosystem II (fqe2) and Photosystem I (fqe1) were two key parameters of SIF emission, which have always been parameterized as fixed values derived from laboratory measurements. To date, only a few studies have focused on evaluating the SCOPE model for SIF interpretation, and the variation of FQE values in the field remains controversial. In this study, the accuracy of the SCOPE model to simulate the canopy SIF was investigated using diurnal experiments on winter wheat. First, ten diurnal experiments were conducted on winter wheat, and the canopy SIF emissions and the SCOPE model's input parameters were directly measured or indirectly retrieved from the spectral radiances, gross primary productivity (GPP) data, and meteorological records. Second, the SCOPE-simulated SIF emissions with fixed FQE values were evaluated using the observed canopy SIF data. The results show that the SCOPE model can reliably interpret the diurnal cycles of SIF variation and provide acceptable results of SIF simulations at the O-2-B (SIFB) and O-2-A (SIFA) bands with RRMSEs of 24.35% and 23.67%, respectively. However, the SCOPE-simulated SIFB and SIFA still contained large systematical deviations at some growth stages of wheat, and the seasonal cycles of the ratio between SIFB and SIFA (SIFA/SIFB) cannot be credibly reproduced. Finally, the SCOPE-simulated SIF emissions with variable FQE values were evaluated using the observed canopy SIF data. The simulating accuracy of SIFB and SIFA can be improved greatly using variable FQE values, and the SCOPE simulations track well with the seasonal SIFA/SIFB values with an RRMSE of 20.63%. The results indicated a clear seasonal pattern of FQE values for unbiased SIF simulation: from the erecting to the flowering stage of wheat, the ratio of fqe1 to fqe2 (fqe1/fqe2) gradually increased from 0.05-0.1 to 0.3-0.5, while the fqe2 value decreased from 0.013 to 0.007. Our quantitative results of the model assessment and the FQE adjustment support the use of the SCOPE model as a powerful tool for interpreting the SIF emissions and can serve as a significant reference for future applications of the SCOPE model.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of a canopy Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence measurement instrument
    Sun, G.
    Wang, X.
    Niu, Zh
    Chen, F.
    [J]. 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE DIGITAL EARTH (ISDE8), 2014, 18
  • [2] Simulating spatially distributed solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence using a BEPS-SCOPE coupling framework
    Cui, Tianxiang
    Sun, Rui
    Xiao, Zhiqiang
    Liang, Ziyu
    Wang, Jian
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2020, 295
  • [3] Modeling canopy conductance and transpiration from solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence
    Shan, Nan
    Ju, Weimin
    Migliavacca, Mirco
    Martini, David
    Guanter, Luis
    Chen, Jingming
    Goulas, Yves
    Zhang, Yongguang
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2019, 268 : 189 - 201
  • [4] Evaluation of the FluorWPS Model and Study of the Parameter Sensitivity for Simulating Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence
    Tong, Chiming
    Bao, Yunfei
    Zhao, Feng
    Fan, Chongrui
    Li, Zhenjiang
    Huang, Qiaolin
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (06) : 1 - 22
  • [5] On the impact of canopy model complexity on simulated carbon, water, and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence fluxes
    Wang, Yujie
    Frankenberg, Christian
    [J]. BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2022, 19 (01) : 29 - 45
  • [6] Response of Canopy Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence to the Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation Absorbed by Chlorophyll
    Du, Shanshan
    Liu, Liangyun
    Liu, Xinjie
    Hu, Jiaochan
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (09)
  • [7] Evaluating the utility of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence for drought monitoring by comparison with NDVI derived from wheat canopy
    Liu, Leizhen
    Yang, Xi
    Zhou, Hongkui
    Liu, Shasha
    Zhou, Lei
    Li, Xiaohan
    Yang, Jianhua
    Han, Xinyi
    Wu, Jianjun
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 625 : 1208 - 1217
  • [8] Influence of the canopy BRDF characteristics and illumination conditions on the retrieval of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence
    Liu, Xinjie
    Liu, Liangyun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 39 (06) : 1782 - 1799
  • [9] Simulating emission and scattering of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence at far-red band in global vegetation with different canopy structures
    Qiu, Bo
    Chen, Jing M.
    Ju, Weimin
    Zhang, Qian
    Zhang, Yongguang
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 233
  • [10] Downscaling of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from canopy level to photosystem level using a random forest model
    Liu, Xinjie
    Guanter, Luis
    Liu, Liangyun
    Damm, Alexander
    Malenovsky, Zbynek
    Rascher, Uwe
    Peng, Dailiang
    Du, Shanshan
    Gastellu-Etchegorry, Jean-Philippe
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 231