Development of a handoff evaluation tool for shift-to-shift physician handoffs: The handoff CEX

被引:41
|
作者
Horwitz, Leora I. [1 ,2 ]
Rand, David [3 ]
Staisiunas, Paul [4 ]
Van Ness, Peter H. [5 ]
Araujo, Katy L. B. [5 ]
Banerjee, Stacy S. [4 ]
Farnan, Jeanne M. [4 ]
Arora, Vineet M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Gen Internal Med Sect, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale New Haven Med Ctr, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Univ Chicago Med, Dept Med, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Geriatr, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
RESIDENT SIGN-OUT; CLINICAL-EVALUATION EXERCISE; COMMUNICATION FAILURES; TASK-FORCE; CARE; IMPROVE; DISCONTINUITY; CONSEQUENCES; STRATEGIES; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1002/jhm.2023
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Increasing frequency of shift-to-shift handoffs coupled with regulatory requirements to evaluate handoff quality make a handoff evaluation tool necessary. OBJECTIVE To develop a handoff evaluation tool. DESIGN Tool development. SETTING Two academic medical centers. SUBJECTS Nurse practitioners, medicine housestaff, and hospitalist attendings. INTERVENTION Concurrent peer and external evaluations of shift-to-shift handoffs. MEASUREMENTS The Handoff CEX (clinical evaluation exercise) consists of 6 subdomains and 1 overall assessment, each scored from 1 to 9, where 1 to 3 is unsatisfactory and 7 to 9 is superior. We assessed range of scores, performance among subgroups, internal consistency, and agreement among types of raters. RESULTS We conducted 675 evaluations of 97 unique individuals during 149 handoff sessions. Scores ranged from unsatisfactory to superior in each domain. The highest rated domain for handoff providers was professionalism (median: 8; interquartile range [IQR]: 79); the lowest was content (median: 7; IQR: 68). Scores at the 2 institutions were similar, and scores did not differ significantly by training level. Spearman correlation coefficients among the CEX subdomains for provider scores ranged from 0.71 to 0.86, except for setting (0.390.40). Third-party external evaluators consistently gave lower marks for the same handoff than peer evaluators did. Weighted kappa scores for provider evaluations comparing external evaluators to peers ranged from 0.28 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.01, 0.56) for setting to 0.59 (95% CI: 0.38, 0.80) for organization. CONCLUSIONS This handoff evaluation tool was easily used by trainees and attendings, had high internal consistency, and performed similarly across institutions. Because peers consistently provided higher scores than external evaluators, this tool may be most appropriate for external evaluation. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;8:191200. (c) 2013 Society of Hospital Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 200
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shift-to-Shift Handoff Effects on Patient Safety and Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    Mardis, Matthew
    Davis, Joshua
    Benningfield, Branden
    Elliott, Cater
    Youngstrom, Mallory
    Nelson, Brittany
    Justice, Ellen M.
    Riesenberg, Lee Ann
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2017, 32 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [2] Validation of a handoff assessment tool: the Handoff CEX
    Horwitz, Leora I.
    Dombroski, Janet
    Murphy, Terrence E.
    Farnan, Jeanne M.
    Johnson, Julie K.
    Arora, Vineet M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2013, 22 (9-10) : 1477 - 1486
  • [3] Bedside Shift-to-Shift Handoffs A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Mardis, Tyler
    Mardis, Matt
    Davis, Joshua
    Justice, Ellen M.
    Holdinsky, Stacie Riley
    Donnelly, John
    Ragozine-Bush, Heather
    Riesenberg, Lee Ann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2016, 31 (01) : 54 - 60
  • [4] The Veterans Affairs Shift Change Physician-to-Physician Handoff Project
    Anderson, Jaclyn
    Shroff, Divya
    Curtis, Ann
    Eldridge, Noel
    Cannon, Katrina
    Karnani, Rajil
    Abrams, Thad
    Kaboli, Peter
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2010, 36 (02): : 62 - +
  • [5] Shift-to-shift handoffs in the NICU: lessons learned from a large scale audit
    Heather C. Kaplan
    Wendy Timpson
    Jeffrey Meyers
    Elizabeth Schierholz
    Howard Cohen
    Marybeth Fry
    Denise Zayack
    Roger F. Soll
    Kate A. Morrow
    Erika M. Edwards
    [J]. Journal of Perinatology, 2023, 43 : 1468 - 1473
  • [6] Shift-to-shift handoffs in the NICU: lessons learned from a large scale audit
    Kaplan, Heather C.
    Timpson, Wendy
    Meyers, Jeffrey
    Schierholz, Elizabeth
    Cohen, Howard
    Fry, Marybeth
    Zayack, Denise
    Soll, Roger F.
    Morrow, Kate A.
    Edwards, Erika M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 43 (12) : 1468 - 1473
  • [7] Adapting the I-PASS Handoff Program for Emergency Department Inter-Shift Handoffs
    Heilman, James A.
    Flanigan, Moira
    Nelson, Anna
    Johnson, Tom
    Yarris, Lalena M.
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (06) : 756 - 761
  • [8] Utilizing Bedside Shift Report to Improve the Effectiveness of Shift Handoff
    Cairns, Leslie L.
    Dudjak, Linda A.
    Hoffmann, Rosemary L.
    Lorenz, Holly L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2013, 43 (03): : 160 - 165
  • [9] Structured Handoff Improves Communication at Shift Change
    Trinh, Hong Trang
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2022, 62 : 77A - 77A
  • [10] An institution-wide handoff task force to standardise and improve physician handoffs
    Horwitz, Leora I.
    Schuster, Kevin M.
    Thung, Stephen F.
    Hersh, David C.
    Fisher, Rosemarie L.
    Shah, Nidhi
    Cushing, William
    Nunes, Judy
    Silverman, David G.
    Jenq, Grace Y.
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2012, 21 (10) : 863 - 871