Using ecosystem service trade-offs to inform water conservation policies and management practices

被引:145
|
作者
Zheng, Hua [1 ]
Li, Yifeng [1 ]
Robinson, Brian E. [2 ]
Liu, Gang [1 ]
Ma, Dongchun [3 ]
Wang, Fengchun [3 ]
Lu, Fei [1 ]
Ouyang, Zhiyun [1 ]
Daily, Gretchen C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Geog, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Beijing Water Sci & Technol Inst, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
BIODIVERSITY; RIVER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/fee.1432
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Environmental managers and policy makers are increasingly discussing trade-offs between ecosystem services, but few studies have analyzed these trade-offs with a view to informing land-use planning. Using specialized models, we quantify ecosystem services in several land-use scenarios relative to actual land-use change over a 9-year period. These scenarios were developed in an effort to maintain agricultural production while improving water quality and increasing water quantity in the watershed of the Miyun Reservoir, the only source of surface water currently available for domestic use in Beijing, China. Within the watershed, from 2000 to 2009, forest cover and urban area increased by 33% and 280%, while water provision and water purification services declined by 9% and 27%, respectively. Under a hybrid scenario of agricultural expansion with riparian grassland buffers, three services - water provision, water purification, and sediment retention - as well as agricultural production all improved as compared with 2009 levels. Riparian grassland protection zones, seldom used in China, can effectively resolve trade-offs among multiple ecosystem services and are now being considered and implemented in several locations.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 532
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ecosystem service trade-offs for adaptive forest management
    Schwaiger, Fabian
    Poschenrieder, Werner
    Biber, Peter
    Pretzsch, Hans
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39
  • [2] Quantifying Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs to Inform Spatial Identification of Forest Restoration
    Li, Ruida
    Li, Ruonan
    Zheng, Hua
    Yang, Yanzheng
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    [J]. FORESTS, 2020, 11 (05):
  • [3] Trade-offs in ecosystem-scale optimization of fisheries management policies
    Christensen, V
    Walters, CJ
    [J]. BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2004, 74 (03) : 549 - 562
  • [4] Assessing trade-offs to inform ecosystem-based fisheries management of forage fish
    Andrew Olaf Shelton
    Jameal F. Samhouri
    Adrian C. Stier
    Philip S. Levin
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 4
  • [5] Assessing trade-offs to inform ecosystem-based fisheries management of forage fish
    Shelton, Andrew Olaf
    Samhouri, Jameal F.
    Stier, Adrian C.
    Levin, Philip S.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2014, 4
  • [6] Trade-offs between fisheries and the conservation of ecosystem function are defined by management strategy
    Brown, Christopher J.
    Mumby, Peter J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 12 (06) : 324 - 329
  • [7] Using Simulation Games to Teach Ecosystem Service Synergies and Trade-offs
    Verutes, Gregory
    Rosenthal, Amy
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICE, 2014, 16 (03) : 194 - 204
  • [8] Coupling management ecosystem service supply-supply trade-offs and supply-demand trade-offs: Framework and practice
    Su, Boru
    Liu, Moucheng
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 166
  • [9] Can landscape-scale approaches to conservation management resolve biodiversity-ecosystem service trade-offs?
    Cordingley, Justine E.
    Newton, Adrian C.
    Rose, Robert J.
    Clarke, Ralph T.
    Bullock, James M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2016, 53 (01) : 96 - 105
  • [10] Ecosystem service trade-offs in wetland management: drainage and rehabilitation of the Hula, Israel
    Cohen-Shacham, E.
    Dayan, T.
    Feitelson, E.
    de Groot, R. S.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2011, 56 (08): : 1582 - 1601