Information Disclosure Model Under Supply Chain Competition with Asymmetric Demand Disruption

被引:7
|
作者
Chen, Kebing [1 ]
Xu, Renxing [1 ]
Fang, Hanwei [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Dept Math, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Inst Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Supply chain; game theory; asymmetric information; disruption; information disclosure; PRICE-COMPETITION; COORDINATION; INVENTORY; PERFORMANCE; CONTRACTS; RETAILERS; OPTION; MARKET; COST; RISK;
D O I
10.1142/S0217595916500433
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper develops the game models of two symmetric supply chains, each consisting of one manufacturer and one retailer, while both retailers compete in the market with a linear function. The disclosure mechanism is designed when the information of the disrupted demand is asymmetric between supply side and retail side. We first study the model with the full information as a benchmark to explore the effect of asymmetric information on the system. In the case, each manufacturer maximizes her profit while the downstream retailer only obtains the reservation profit. For the case of asymmetric information, each manufacturer can obtain the real information of the disrupted demand by using a menu of contract bundles. For each information structure, there are always robust regions for each manufacturer's original trading quantity scheme. That is, when the disrupted amount of the demand is sufficiently small, the trading quantity will be unchanged. However, some special measures, e.g., the higher unit wholesale price, should be taken to prevent the retailer from deviating the trading quantity scheme. The high-disruption retailer gets the higher profit due to the information rent. Compared with a single supply chain, Cournot competition results in the less retail price and the lower performance for the whole system.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision Models Of Supply Chain Under Asymmetric Information With Demand Disruption
    Jiang, Xinrong
    Li, Yongchao
    [J]. SMART MATERIALS AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2011, 143-144 : 773 - 781
  • [2] Informed Principal Model and Contract in Supply Chain with Demand Disruption Asymmetric Information
    Zhang, Huan
    Jiang, Jianli
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2016, 2016
  • [3] Research on supply chain disruption coordination mechanisms under algebraic demand and asymmetric information
    Zhuang, Pin
    Zhao, Lin-Du
    [J]. 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 1659 - 1663
  • [4] Information disclosure decisions in an organic food supply chain under competition
    Yu, Yanan
    He, Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 292
  • [5] Information Sharing in Competing Supply Chain Under Demand Asymmetric
    Chen Xiaoling
    [J]. LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN RESEARCH IN CHINA, 2010, : 137 - 143
  • [6] Optimization under Asymmetric Information and Elastic Demand in Supply Chain
    Lang Yanhuai
    [J]. SYSTEMS, ORGANIZATIONS AND MANAGEMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD WORKSHOP OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY IN SCIENTIFIC INVENTIONS, 2009, : 362 - 367
  • [7] Compensation and information disclosure strategies of a green supply chain under production disruption
    Li, Shanshan
    He, Yong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 281
  • [8] Information Sharing and Channel Construction of Supply Chain under Asymmetric Demand Information
    Wu, Guangdong
    Kong, Qingshan
    Shi, Jian-gang
    Karimi, Hamid Reza
    Zhang, Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2014,
  • [9] Competition and cooperation in a supply chain with an offline showroom under asymmetric information
    Li, Mengli
    Zhang, Xumei
    Dan, Bin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (19) : 5964 - 5979
  • [10] Supply chain contracts under demand and cost disruptions with asymmetric information
    Lei, Dong
    Li, Jianbin
    Liu, Zhixue
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 139 (01) : 116 - 126