Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry

被引:298
|
作者
Clemens, J
Trimborn, M
Weiland, P
Amon, B
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Plant Nutr, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
[2] Fed Agr Res Ctr, Inst Technol & Biosyst Engn, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
[3] Univ Nat Resources & Appl Life Sci, Dept Sustainable Agr Syst, Div Agr Engn, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
关键词
biogas; greenhouse gases; nitrous oxide; methane; ammonia; slurry; manure management;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2005.08.016
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Biogas treatment of animal manures is an upcoming technology because it is a way of producing renewable energy (biogas). However, little is known about effects of this management strategy on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during fermentation, storage, and field application of the substrates compared to untreated slurries. In this study, we compared cattle slurry and cattle slurry with potato starch as additive during the process of fermentation, during storage and after field application. The addition of potato starch strongly enhanced CH4 production from 4230 I CH4 m(-3) to 8625 I CH4 m(-3) in the fermenter at a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 29 days. Extending the HRT to 56 days had only a small effect on the CH4 production. Methane emissions from stored slurry depended on storage temperature and were highest from unfermented slurry followed by the slurry/starch mixture. Gas emissions from untreated and fermented slurry during storage were further analyzed in a pilot-scale experiment with different levels of covering such as straw cover, a wooden lid and no cover. Emissions of greenhouse gases (CH4, N2O, NH3) were in the range of 14.3-17.1 kg CO2 eq. m(-3) during winter (100 day storage period) and 40.5-90.5 kg CO2 eq. m-3 during summer (140 day storage period). A straw cover reduced NH3 losses, but not overall GHG emissions, whereas a solid cover reduced CH4 and NH3 emissions. After field application, there were no significant differences between slurry types in GHG emissions (4.15-8.12 kg CO2 eq. m(-3) a(-1)). GHG emissions from slurry stores were more important than emissions after field application. Co-digestion of slurry with additives such as starch has a large potential to substitute fossil energy by biogas. On a biogas plant, slurry stores should be covered gas-tight in order to eliminate GHG emissions and collect CH4 for electricity production. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 177
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy balance, greenhouse gas emissions, and profitability of thermobarical pretreatment of cattle waste in anaerobic digestion
    Budde, Joern
    Prochnow, Annette
    Ploechl, Matthias
    Quinones, Teresa Suarez
    Heiermann, Monika
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 49 : 390 - 410
  • [2] Mitigation of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from stored cattle slurry using acidifiers and chemical amendments
    Kavanagh, I
    Burchill, W.
    Healy, M. G.
    Fenton, O.
    Krol, D. J.
    Lanigan, G. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 237
  • [3] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by adopting anaerobic digestion technology on dairy, sow and pig farms in Finland
    Kaparaju, P.
    Rintala, J.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [4] Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Slurry Storage: Impacts of Temperature and Potential Mitigation through Covering (Pig Slurry) or Acidification (Cattle Slurry)
    Misselbrook, Tom
    Hunt, John
    Perazzolo, Francesca
    Provolo, Giorgio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2016, 45 (05) : 1520 - 1530
  • [5] The Role of Anaerobic Digestion in Reducing Dairy Farm Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Scott, Alun
    Blanchard, Richard
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 18
  • [6] Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from vinasse through anaerobic digestion
    Moraes, Bruna S.
    Petersen, Soren O.
    Zaiat, Marcelo
    Sommer, Sven G.
    Triolo, Jin Mi
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 189 : 21 - 30
  • [7] Greenhouse gas emissions in sludge ultrasonication followed by anaerobic digestion processes
    Sridhar, Pilli
    Tyagi, R. D.
    Bhunia, Puspendu
    Rout, Prangya Ranjan
    Zhang, Tian C.
    Surampalli, Rao Y.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 341
  • [8] Anaerobic digestion of agricultural and other substrates - implications for greenhouse gas emissions
    Pucker, J.
    Jungmeier, G.
    Siegl, S.
    Poetsch, E. M.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2013, 7 : 283 - 291
  • [9] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle production systems
    Samsonstuen, Stine
    Aby, Bente A.
    Crosson, Paul
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Aass, Laila
    [J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 69 (04): : 220 - 232
  • [10] ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION OF CATTLE SLURRY IN AN UPFLOW ANAEROBIC FILTER
    PECK, MW
    HAWKES, FR
    [J]. BIOMASS, 1987, 13 (02): : 125 - 133