A method to evaluate hydraulic fracture using proppant detection

被引:13
|
作者
Liu, Juntao [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Feng [1 ]
Gardner, Robin P. [2 ]
Hou, Guojing [2 ]
Zhang, Quanying [1 ]
Li, Hu [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Sch Geosci, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Nucl Engn, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Maxwell Dynam Inc, Houston, TX 77074 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Proppant detection; Hydraulic facture height; Gd capture gamma rays;
D O I
10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.08.003
中图分类号
O61 [无机化学];
学科分类号
070301 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Accurate determination of the proppant placement and propped fracture height are important for evaluating and optimizing stimulation strategies. A technology using non-radioactive proppant and a pulsed neutron gamma energy spectra logging tool to determine the placement and height of propped fractures is proposed. Gd2O3 was incorporated into ceramic proppant and a Monte Carlo method was utilized to build the logging tools and formation models. Characteristic responses of the recorded information of different logging tools to fracture widths, proppant concentrations and influencing factors were studied. The results show that Gd capture gamma rays can be used to evaluate propped fractures and it has higher sensitivity to the change of fracture width and traceable proppant content compared with the exiting non-radioactive proppant evaluation techniques and only an after-fracture measurement is needed for the new method; The changes in gas saturation and borehole size have a great impact on determining propped fractures when compensated neutron and pulsed neutron capture tool are used. A field example is presented to validate the application of the new technique. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 143
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of Proppant Parameters on Hydraulic Fracture Conductivity
    Yang, Ying
    Fu, Xiaofei
    Yuan, Haiyun
    Khaidina, M. P.
    Wei, Jianguang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINING SCIENCE, 2023, 59 (05) : 776 - 789
  • [2] Dynamic bridging of proppant particles in a hydraulic fracture
    Garagash, I. A.
    Osiptsov, A. A.
    Boronin, S. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2019, 135 : 86 - 101
  • [3] Computer simulations of proppant transport in a hydraulic fracture
    Mobbs, AT
    Hammond, PS
    [J]. SPE PRODUCTION & FACILITIES, 2001, 16 (02): : 112 - 121
  • [4] Coupled Hydraulic Fracture and Proppant Transport Simulation
    Roostaei, Morteza
    Nouri, Alireza
    Fattahpour, Vahidoddin
    Chan, Dave
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (11)
  • [5] PROPPANT MIGRATION WITHIN A ROUGH HYDRAULIC FRACTURE
    He, Xiaodong
    Wei, Dongya
    Yu, Huiyong
    Bai, Bingyang
    Chen, Ang
    Liang, Tianbo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POROUS MEDIA, 2023, 26 (04) : 1 - 15
  • [6] Influence of Proppant Parameters on Hydraulic Fracture Conductivity
    Ying Yang
    Xiaofei Fu
    Haiyun Yuan
    M. P. Khaidina
    Jianguang Wei
    [J]. Journal of Mining Science, 2023, 59 : 776 - 789
  • [7] Monitoring hydraulic fracture volume using borehole to surface electromagnetic and conductive proppant
    Hoversten, G. Michael
    Schwarzbach, Christoph
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2021, 86 (01) : E93 - E109
  • [8] A monolithic coupled hydraulic fracture model with proppant transport
    Rivas, Endrina
    Gracie, Robert
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 372
  • [9] Role of proppant distribution on the evolution of hydraulic fracture conductivity
    Wang, Jiehao
    Elsworth, Derek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 166 : 249 - 262
  • [10] Physics of Proppant Transport Through Hydraulic Fracture Network
    Chang, Oliver
    Kinzel, Michael
    Dilmore, Robert
    Wang, John Yilin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2018, 140 (03):