What are the most effective behaviour change techniques to promote physical activity and/or reduce sedentary behaviour in inactive adults? A systematic review protocol

被引:13
|
作者
Howlett, Neil [1 ]
Trivedi, Daksha [2 ]
Troop, Nicholas A. [1 ]
Chater, Angel Marie [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hertfordshire, Dept Psychol, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
[2] Univ Hertfordshire, Ctr Res Primary & Community Care, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
[3] UCL, UCL Sch Pharm, Ctr Behav Med, Res Dept Practice & Policy, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 08期
关键词
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; TIME; INTERVENTIONS; MORTALITY; RISK; METAANALYSIS; DIETARY; CARE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008573
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Large proportions of the population are not meeting recommended levels of physical activity and have increasingly sedentary lifestyles. Low levels of physical activity are predictive of poor health outcomes and time spent sedentary is related to a host of risk factors independently of physical activity levels. Building an evidence base of the best approaches to intervene in the lifestyles of inactive individuals is crucial in preventing long-term disease, disability and higher mortality rates. Methods and analysis: Systematic searches will be conducted on all relevant databases (eg, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO). Studies will be included if they assess interventions aimed at changing physical activity or sedentary behaviour levels in adults (over 18) who are inactive and do not suffer from chronic conditions. Studies must also be randomised controlled trials (RCTs), have a primary outcome of physical activity or sedentary behaviour, and measure outcomes at least 6 months after intervention completion. Studies will be coded using the Behaviour Change Technique (BCT) taxonomy v1 and Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) guidelines. 2 reviewers will independently screen full-text articles and extract data on study characteristics, participants, BCTs, intervention features and outcome measures. Study quality will also be assessed independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis will be considered if there is sufficient homogeneity across outcomes. GRADE criteria will be used to assess quality of evidence. Dissemination: This will be the first review to systematically appraise interventions aimed at changing the physical activity or sedentary behaviour of inactive individuals using RCT designs with a 6-month follow-up post-intervention. This review will better inform intervention designers targeting inactive populations and inform the design of a future complex intervention.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Which Behaviour Change Techniques Are Most Effective at Increasing Older Adults' Self-Efficacy and Physical Activity Behaviour? A Systematic Review
    French, David P.
    Olander, Ellinor K.
    Chisholm, Anna
    Mc Sharry, Jennifer
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2014, 48 (02) : 225 - 234
  • [2] Which behaviour change techniques are effective to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in adults: a factorial randomized trial of an e- and m-health intervention
    Schroe, Helene
    Van Dyck, Delfien
    De Paepe, Annick
    Poppe, Louise
    Loh, Wen Wei
    Verloigne, Maite
    Loeys, Tom
    De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
    Crombez, Geert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [3] Which behaviour change techniques are effective to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in adults: a factorial randomized trial of an e- and m-health intervention
    Helene Schroé
    Delfien Van Dyck
    Annick De Paepe
    Louise Poppe
    Wen Wei Loh
    Maïté Verloigne
    Tom Loeys
    Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
    Geert Crombez
    [J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 17
  • [4] Using nudges to promote physical activity and to reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: a scoping review protocol
    Forberger, Sarah
    Wichmann, Frauke
    Comito, Chiara Nicoletta Nicoletta
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11):
  • [5] Mobile health interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in the workplace: A systematic review
    Buckingham, Sarah Ann
    Williams, Andrew James
    Morrissey, Karyn
    Price, Lisa
    Harrison, John
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2019, 5
  • [6] Dyadic interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Carr, R. M.
    Prestwich, A.
    Kwasnicka, D.
    Thogersen-Ntoumani, C.
    Gucciardi, D. F.
    Quested, E.
    Hall, L. H.
    Ntoumanis, N.
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2019, 13 (01) : 91 - 109
  • [7] The relationship between sedentary behaviour and physical activity in adults: A systematic review
    Mansoubi, Maedeh
    Pearson, Natalie
    Biddle, Stuart J. H.
    Clemes, Stacy
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 69 : 28 - 35
  • [8] Effectiveness of physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions in altering sedentary behaviour among older adults: a systematic review
    McCorry, Michael J.
    Murphy, Marie H.
    Bleakley, Chris
    Mair, Jacqueline
    [J]. LANCET, 2018, 392 : 61 - 61
  • [9] DAILY PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND SEDENTARY (INACTIVE) BEHAVIOUR OF ADULTS FROM SURGUT
    Loginov, S. I.
    [J]. HUMAN SPORT MEDICINE, 2019, 19 (04): : 70 - 77
  • [10] A mixed method systematic review of primary school based interventions to promote physical activity and/or reduce sedentary behaviour
    Jones, Michelle
    Defever, Emmanuel
    Mackintosh, Kelly
    Letsinger, Ayland
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10): : S121 - S121